- 1 Kinh Nghiệm về Which of the following psychologists is most strongly associated with research on false memories? Mới Nhất
- 2 Abstract
- 3 PTSD and Memory
- 4 Depression and Memory
- 5 False Memory
- 6 Associative Activation
- 7 Structure of the Review
- 8 PTSD, Trauma, and False Memory
- 9 Depression and False Memory
- 10 Meta-Analysis
- 11 Discussion and Conclusion
- 12 Other Forms of Psychopathology and False Memory
- 13 Psychopathology in Practice
- 14 A Look Into the Future
- 15 Concluding Remarks
- 16 Supplementary Material
- 17 Notes
- 18 Footnotes
- 19 References
- 19.1 Who was John Watson AP Psychology?
- 19.2 Which psychologists is best associated with studying the function of memory?
- 19.3 Who is Elizabeth Loftus quizlet?
- 19.4 What are false memories quizlet?
- 19.5 Video Which of the following psychologists is most strongly associated with research on false memories? ?
- 19.6 Chia Sẻ Link Download Which of the following psychologists is most strongly associated with research on false memories? miễn phí
Kinh Nghiệm về Which of the following psychologists is most strongly associated with research on false memories? Mới Nhất
Bạn đang tìm kiếm từ khóa Which of the following psychologists is most strongly associated with research on false memories? được Cập Nhật vào lúc : 2022-09-06 16:05:20 . Với phương châm chia sẻ Bí quyết về trong nội dung bài viết một cách Chi Tiết 2022. Nếu sau khi tìm hiểu thêm tài liệu vẫn ko hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại Comments ở cuối bài để Admin lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha.
- Journal List SAGE Choice PMC5665161
Clin Psychol Sci.
2022 Nov; 5(6): 1048–1069.
Nội dung chính
- PTSD and MemoryDepression and MemoryFalse MemoryAssociative ActivationAssociative activation and false memoryAssociative activation and psychopathologyStructure of the ReviewPTSD, Trauma, and False MemoryDifferent types of emotional
material or nonassociative materialDepression and False MemoryMeta-AnalysisDiscussion and ConclusionOther Forms of Psychopathology and False MemoryPsychopathology in PracticeA Look Into the FuturePsychopathology and suggestibilityConcluding RemarksSupplementary MaterialWho was John Watson AP Psychology?Which psychologists is best associated with studying the function of memory?Who is Elizabeth Loftus quizlet?What are false memories quizlet?
In clinical and court settings, it is imperative to know whether posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression may make people susceptible to false memories. We conducted a review of the literature on false memory effects in participants with PTSD, a history of trauma, or depression. When emotional associative material was presented to these groups, their levels of false
memory were raised relative to those in relevant comparison groups. This difference did not consistently emerge when neutral or nonassociative material was presented. Our conclusion is supported by a quantitative comparison of effect sizes between studies using emotional associative or neutral, nonassociative material. Our review suggests that individuals with PTSD, a history of trauma, or depression are risk for producing false memories when they are exposed to information that is related to
their knowledge base.
Keywords: false memory, psychopathology, PTSD, depression, trauma history, associative activation
Memory aberrations are notable characteristics of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. For example, individuals with these disorders tend to recollect emotionally negative experiences better than emotionally positive events
(Mathews & MacLeod, 2005) and can exhibit overgeneral memories (Ono, Devilly, & Shum, 2022). It is not surprising that many studies have focused on the links among PTSD,
depression, and memory. The bulk of this research has been concerned with the amount of information that can be correctly remembered (Koriat, Goldsmith, & Pansky, 2000) thereby neglecting false memories
(Hertel & Brozovich, 2010). This gap in the literature is peculiar given that the mechanisms that affect correct remembering can, in principle, also affect susceptibility to false memories. For example, the fact that people with depression are most likely to retrieve emotionally negative experiences may reflect an elaborated underlying memory network. Such
a network may contain densely intertwined and well-integrated negative memories that are strongly connected and easily activated and retrieved. Spreading activation theorists would argue not only that this network will produce true negative memories more easily than neutral or positive memories, but also that it will more readily generate false negative memories
(Howe, Wimmer, Gagnon, & Plumpton, 2009).
In clinical settings, individuals with PTSD or depression may seek an explanation for their complaints and therapists might ask them to retrieve childhood memories
(Patihis, Ho, Tingen, Lilienfeld, & Loftus, 2014). Such dialogues may serve as fertile ground for false memories of, for example, childhood sexual abuse (Loftus, 2005), which
in turn might lead to false accusations. From a legal standpoint, the issue of false memories is especially pertinent because victims (e.g., of sexual abuse) who provide statements to the police often suffer from psychopathological disorders such as PTSD or depression (e.g., Bifulco, Brown, & Adler, 1991;
Kiser, Heston, Millsap, & Pruitt, 1991). Criminal proceedings often boil down to the reliability of such statements because objective forensic (e.g., physical) evidence is often lacking in these cases. Hence, triers of fact are frequently being asked to base their legal decisions on the memories of alleged victims. The conundrum here
is that testimony can be plagued by memory aberrations, ones that could end up in false accusations and wrongful convictions (Howe & Knott, 2015; Howe, Knott, & Conway, 2022; Otgaar, de Ruiter, Howe, Hoetmer, & Van Reekum, 2022).
Thus, what memory researchers, legal professionals, and mental health professionals need to know is whether depression or PTSD can make people more susceptible to false memories. Although empirical work in this area has been conducted, results are inconsistent. Indeed, as
Bookbinder and Brainerd (2022, p.. 1345 recently opined, “With respect to PTSD especially, available data do not provide a consistent picture of false memory effects.”
In what follows, we show that when extant studies are viewed from an associative network perspective, their results are not as inconsistent as they might have
first appeared. In this review, we have amassed the literature on psychopathology and false memory and demonstrate that the concept of associative activation can explain the discrepant findings in the extant literature. Although limited, most of the work in this domain has focused on false memories in PTSD, depression, and schizophrenia. Because memory distortions in schizophrenia are phenomenologically quite different (e.g.,
Aleman, Hijman, De Haan, & Kahn, 1999), we focus our review on PTSD and depression, which are both forms of psychopathology that are characterized by associative activation mechanisms. First, we provide a synopsis of the literature on the links among PTSD, depression, and (false) memory. We then show how these links can be explained
using associative-activation theory and how the spreading of such activation through memory networks fuels the formation of false memories. Following this, we show how our findings relate to the impact of trauma on the production of false memory. To anticipate our findings, we demonstrate that PTSD, a history of trauma, and depression are strongly linked to false memory vulnerability. However, this link is apparent only when individuals with these problems are presented with emotional material
(e.g., trauma-related stimuli) that is directly the heart of their psychopathology.
PTSD and Memory
A prerequisite for being diagnosed with PTSD is that a person has experienced or witnessed a traumatic sự kiện. One of the key symptoms of this disorder is that the traumatic sự kiện is reexperienced. Indeed, people with PTSD are often haunted by recurrent, involuntary, and intrusive distressing
memories of the traumatic sự kiện. This observation has led some authors to view PTSD as a disorder of memory (Brewin, 2014; McNally, 2003). Several theories have been postulated to explain the etiology of
PTSD and many of them stress the importance of memory (aberrations) in the maintenance of this type of psychopathology.
For example, Ehlers and Clark (2000) proposed that PTSD symptoms mainly occur because traumatic memories are poorly elaborated and integrated, and hence PTSD patients often experience problems with
intentionally recalling traumatic details. These authors stress that details in traumatic autobiographical memories are strongly associated with each other so that one external cue (e.g., a certain sound) may automatically evoke a cascade of related traumatic memories (e.g., the memory of being abused). Rubin, Berntsen, and Bohni (2008)
place an even greater emphasis on the role of memory in the development of PTSD. They suggest that although the diagnosis of PTSD requires the identification of a traumatic sự kiện, the memory of that traumatic sự kiện is even more crucial than the sự kiện itself. Finally, Brewin, Dalgleish, and Joseph (1996) argue that
traumatic experiences result in two types of memory representations. One type is concerned with the conscious experience of the trauma and includes verbally accessible knowledge. These memories refer to sensory characteristics of the sự kiện and might lead to intrusions about the experience. A second type of representation refers to the unconscious processing of the trauma and is called situationally accessible knowledge. This type of memory is automatically retrieved when a person is in a
situation that is similar to the experienced trauma and this automatic retrieval can then result in flashbacks of the trauma (see also Meyer et al., 2013). Collectively, these theories put the role of memory the center of PTSD.
Depression and Memory
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), depression involves the presence of depressed mood or anhedonia in combination with a number of vital symptoms such as fatigue, sleeplessness, impaired concentration, and suicidal ideation. Besides these symptoms, depression is
also regarded as a disorder that is characterized by several distinct autobiographical memory dysfunctions (Dalgleish & Werner-Seidler, 2014). The basic tenet in depression concerning memory is that depressed people remember the past differently than people without depression. Specifically, autobiographical memory functioning is
compromised in four unique and interrelated ways that impact the maintenance of depressive episodes and affect proneness to new depressive episodes. The first and most notable memory characteristic of depression concerns the biased recollection of negative experiences. Depressed people are more likely to recall negative personal memories than nondepressed people and also have more unbidden intrusive and oftentimes traumatic memories
(Williams et al., 2007).
Second, the biased remembrance of negative experience goes hand in hand with impoverished retrieval of emotionally positive autobiographical memories
(Gotlib & Joormann, 2010). It is important that even when such positive autobiographical memories are retrieved, they do not enhance positive mood (Joormann & Siemer, 2004).
Worse still, some researchers suggest that the retrieval of positive memories might worsen a sad mood (Joormann, Siemer, & Gotlib, 2007). This difficulty in recalling positive autobiographical memories appears to point to impoverished phenomenological qualities of these memories. Depressed people experience positive memories as less
vivid and less emotionally intense than nondepressed people (e.g., Werner-Seidler & Moulds, 2012).
A third memory feature of depression is that efforts to cope with painful and traumatic memories seem to be prevalent
(Beblo et al., 2012; Dalgleish & Yiend, 2006;
Sumner, 2012). Paradoxically, coping strategies such as suppression have been found to increase intrusive memories in depressed individuals (Wenzlaff, Wegner, & Roper, 1988).
Suppression might be especially pernicious in depressed individuals as it paves the way to easy access of other upsetting memories (Dalgleish & Yiend, 2006). A related issue here is that when depressed individuals recall a visually rich positive or negative autobiographical memory, such memory is oftentimes seen from an observer
perspective. Research has shown that especially for positive memories, such a perspective might not be helpful as it might reduce the emotional impact related to the memory (Nigro & Neisser, 1983).
The final and fourth core characteristic of depression is that autobiographical recollections are frequently categorical and overgeneral in
nature. Thus, autobiographical memories of depressed individuals frequently contain repetitions and generalizations across personal experiences. Overgeneral processing hinders the easy retrieval of more detailed autobiographical memories, which may interfere with problem solving strategies (Williams et al., 2007). Taking these memory
disturbances into account, depression, like PTSD, can be regarded as a disorder in which memory aberrations are a common occurrence.
What has become known as the memory wars revolved around the issue of whether traumatic memories can be repressed and then many years later be recovered in, for example, a therapeutic environment
(Lindsay & Read, 1994; Loftus, 1994). Many mental health professionals asserted that they saw patients in their clinical practice who, after extensive treatment, remembered a traumatic childhood
incident (e.g., sexual abuse). In response to these clinical observations, many memory researchers argued that psychotherapeutic interventions often involve inherently suggestive prompts, ones that might have led patients to falsely remember entire episodes of trauma. In tư vấn of this notion, some patients who initially remembered having been abused, later retracted their claims, arguing that their memories were contaminated because of the suggestive treatment that they had received (e.g., Maran, 2012; Ost, Costall, & Bull, 2002). In many of these cases, people were in therapy because they suffered from some form of psychopathology. The question then arises as to whether their psychopathology might have
affected their susceptibility to false memories. Scoboria and colleagues (2022) recently argued that “people struggling with psychopathology who seek help for their symptoms may be particularly vulnerable to suggestions” (p.. 160). However, a meta-analytic review looking into the evidence for or against this position has so far been lacking.
In the false memory literature, two general classes of false memory can be distinguished and different paradigms have been invented to
experimentally evoke these false memories (Brainerd, Reyna, & Ceci, 2008; Otgaar, Howe, Brackmann, & Smeets, 2022). On the one hand, false memories can be induced by using
suggestive pressure, which we will call suggestion-induced false memories. On the other hand, false memories can occur spontaneously, without any external pressure, arising predominantly because of the automatic and nonconscious operation of internal memory mechanisms such as spreading activation (see the later discussion). This latter type of false memory has been referred to as spontaneous false memories. Both types of false memories can arise in legal cases and in clinical
settings (Brackmann, Otgaar, Sauerland, & Jelicic, 2022; Howe et al., 2022).
Several paradigms have been constructed to evoke suggestion-induced false memories. One of the most
popular and well-suited techniques is the misinformation paradigm (Loftus, 2005; Otgaar, Candel, Smeets, & Merckelbach, 2010). In general, the misinformation paradigm consists of three stages.
During the first stage, participants are presented with a video-taped or real-life crime situation. Following this, participants are presented with misinformation. This may take the form of suggestive questions (e.g., “What weapon did the hijacker carry?” while actually no weapon was present) or an eyewitness account in which false details have been included. The final stage is composed of a memory test, and here a recurring finding is that participants remember the suggested elements although
in reality they were not present. This is known as the misinformation effect.
Another way to induce suggestion-induced false memories is through the use of the implantation paradigm (Loftus & Pickrell, 1995;
Otgaar, Scoboria, & Smeets, 2013). In this paradigm, experimenters make contact with the participants’ parents. Parents are asked whether they can provide an autobiographical sự kiện that their child had truly experienced. The parents are then questioned regarding whether they can confirm that their child did not experience a
manufactured false sự kiện (e.g., hot air balloon ride). After this, participants are suggestively interviewed about the truly experienced sự kiện as well as a false sự kiện (e.g., a hot air balloon ride that has never taken place). Specifically, they are told that their parents stated that they experienced both events in their childhood and the instruction is to come up with everything they can still remember about the events. A recent mega-analysis on eight false memory implantation studies showed
that 30.4% of statements provided in these studies were classified as false memories (Scoboria et al., 2022). Both of these paradigms, but the implantation paradigm in particular, can be seen as an experimental analogue of how false memories for parts of an sự kiện or even an entire sự kiện can be elicited in a suggestive therapeutic
The most frequently used paradigm to assess the formation of spontaneous false memories is the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott,
1995). In this paradigm, several lists of words that are associatively related to each other are presented to participants (e.g., night, pillow, moon). These associatively related words are all linked to a nonpresented critical lure word (i.e., sleep). A reliable finding is that participants falsely recall or recognize the critical lure with rates that are often indistinguishable from true memory rates
(Roediger, Watson, McDermott, & Gallo, 2001). There are two main reasons for the popularity of the DRM paradigm. First, the DRM false memory illusion is a robust memory effect that is quite resistant against forewarnings or divided attention tasks (e.g.,
Otgaar, Peters, & Howe, 2012; Peters et al., 2008). Second, emotionally laden DRM memories are likely to evoke emotional reactions quite similar to the ones evoked by
emotional autobiographical memories (Rubin & Talarico, 2009).
As will become clear shortly, most work regarding the link between false memory and psychopathology has concentrated on spontaneous false memory. In the current article, we will focus predominantly on the link between (spontaneous) false memories as
elicited by the DRM paradigm and psychopathology. Where possible, we will discuss work on psychopathology and suggestibility, but, as will become obvious, this area is heavily underresearched. The main focus on spontaneous false memory is imperative as research has shown that results from the spontaneous false memory field cannot easily be generalized to the field of suggestion-induced false memory. Specifically, there are studies showing that spontaneous false memories and suggestion-induced
false memories are unrelated to each other (e.g., Calvillo & Parong, 2022; Ost et al., 2013;
Otgaar & Candel, 2010). This suggests that different mechanisms might lead to the production of these false memories. A key mechanism underlying the production of spontaneous false memory is associative activation.
activation plays a major role in theories related to memory. One prominent theory concerning the organization of memory is the spreading activation (or associative activation; Howe et al., 2009) account (Anderson, 1983;
Balota & Duchek, 1989; Collins & Loftus, 1975;
Reder, Park, & Kieffaber, 2009). According to this account, memory contains a multitude of representations or nodes that are interconnected by associative links. Whenever someone experiences an sự kiện and encodes information from that sự kiện, nodes containing information from that particular sự kiện will activate related nodes and
concepts in memory networks. This activation will automatically spread to neighboring nodes, thereby triggering related memories concerning the sự kiện that may or may not have been part of the original sự kiện.
Traditionally, spreading activation accounts have been used to explain semantic priming effects in memory experiments. The semantic priming effect refers to the finding that participants are faster responding to a certain word (e.g., cat) when it is preceded by
an associatively related word (e.g., dog) relative to when it is preceded by an unrelated word (e.g., house; Hutchinson, 2003). The most likely explanation for this effect is that stimulus encoding will lead to spreading activation across related concepts and this occurs quickly and unintentionally outside of conscious
awareness (Neely, 1977; Posner & Snyder, 1975).
Associative activation and false memory
The concept of spreading
activation has also attracted the interest of false memory researchers. The activation-monitoring theory (AMT; Roediger, Balota, & Watson, 2001) posits that false memories are the product of activation of concepts that were not part of the original sự kiện but that become activated when information from the actual sự kiện spreads through a network of
interrelated nodes. For example, when the words “bed,” “night,” and “pillow” are learned, concepts (words) that are strongly related to these words (i.e., “sleep”) will be activated as well thereby giving rise to false memories. AMT stipulates that besides spreading activation, monitoring processes play an important role in editing out the retrieval of false memories. That is, AMT posits that during retrieval, memories are monitored and checked as to whether they were internally generated (e.g.,
through imagination) or originated from an external source. AMT would predict that false memories are more prevalent among children than adults because children have more problems with source monitoring (Lindsay, Johnson, & Kwon, 1991). However, DRM research has oftentimes found that adults are more susceptible to false memory
production than children (Brainerd et al., 2008; Howe et al., 2009;
Otgaar & Candel, 2010).
An alternative theory using the notion of spreading activation is associative-activation theory (AAT; Howe et al., 2009;
Otgaar, Howe, Peters, Smeets, & Moritz, 2014). AAT proposes that throughout the course of development, people acquire new knowledge and learn new information. The consequence of this is that their knowledge base becomes more elaborated, interrelated, and dense. According to AAT, a knowledge base consists of interrelated nodes that
contain representations of information (e.g., autobiographical memories). When someone experiences an sự kiện, these nodes will be triggered by associative activation. The links between these nodes will become stronger and associative activation will be faster and more automatic as development proceeds and new knowledge is acquired. AAT posits that during the process of associative activation, nodes will be activated that represent concepts of information that were not really experienced, thereby
leading to the formation of false memories. The concepts can be quite diverse and may involve phonological, semantic, or categorical bits of information. It is important that although it has been argued that associative activation mainly has short-lived effects on memory (Reyna, Corbin, Weldon, & Brainerd, 2022), there exists
considerable evidence that this mechanism actually has some very long-lasting effects on memory and memory-related tasks (e.g., problem solving; e.g., Hayne & Gross, 2022; Steyvers
& Tenenbaum, 2005).
For example, recent experimentation has focused on the adaptive and long-term consequences of false memories (e.g., Howe, Garner, Charlesworth, & Knott, 2011;
Otgaar et al., 2015). In this line of research, participants are first presented with the DRM paradigm and then receive a compound remote association task (CRAT) problem. A CRAT consists of three words (e.g., walk/beauty/over) and the task is to come up with the word that connects these words (i.e., sleep). The standard
finding is that CRAT problems primed by false memories for critical lures are solved more frequently than problems without priming. It is important that such priming effects seem to last after a delay of one week (Howe, Wilkinson, & Monaghan, 2012;
Wang et al., 2022). The longevity of associative activation is present not only in adults, but also in young children (Hayne & Gross, 2022).
used to explain the occurrence of false memories, one that is linked to AAT, is fuzzy trace theory (FTT; Brainerd et al., 2008). According to this theory, when someone experiences an sự kiện, two opponent memory traces are stored: verbatim and gist. Verbatim traces store the exact details of an experience whereas gist traces are involved in
the processing of the underlying meaning of the sự kiện. FTT states that exact details of the verbatim trace cannot be retrieved when there is a long interval between encoding and retrieval. In that case, memory will tend to rely on gist traces. When gist is relied on, false memories might occur. Although gist extraction and FTT seem to be similar to associative activation and AAT, there are important differences between these approaches. First, AAT is a single process theory that only relies on
the core notion of association activation. FTT requires an additional step in that both gist and verbatim traces are thought to be important in (false) memory development. Whether a dual-process theory (FTT) or a more parsimonious single-process theory (AAT) is necessary to account for the production of false memories is still a matter for debate
(Howe, 2008). Second, associative activation refers to the association between many different types of concepts (e.g., phonological, semantic, categorical), whereas gist extraction is only focused on the retrieval of semantics. Thus, whereas AAT can account for the fact that both semantically and phonologically related items can increase
false memory rates, FTT cannot (see Finley, Sungkhasettee, Roediger, & Balota, 2022). Third, and something that is critical to what we are discussing in the current article, recent evidence has demonstrated that mood-congruent false memories are better explained by AAT than FTT particularly for moods that lead to increased automatic processing of
information (Zhang, Gross, & Hayne, in press).
Associative activation and psychopathology
Our focus on the role of associative activation in the production of false memory also aligns well with recent insights into how psychiatric
symptoms may develop over time. Increased empirical attention has been targeted the notion that mental disorders should be viewed as causal systems integrated in networks of interrelated symptoms (Borsboom & Cramer, 2014;
Fried & Cramer, in press). According to this network model interpretation of psychopathology, symptoms are causally linked to other symptoms (e.g., insomnia leads to concentration problems). It is interesting that in network models of PTSD, memory-related symptoms such as amnesia and intrusions are included as well (McNally et al., 2015). This implies that memory-related symptoms might be related to each other, which is also the case in associative memory theories.
For the current purpose, we have specifically focused on the role of associative activation in false memories that might accompany depression and PTSD. There are good reasons for this approach. Based on the
literature, it becomes clear that PTSD and depression are uniquely characterized by increased levels of spreading activation. Several theories assert that in PTSD, traumatic autobiographical memories are highly associated to each other in that traumatic memories can automatically activate other related memories (Ehlers & Clark, 2000).
Likewise, one common notion is that in PTSD, intrusive memories are the result of spreading activation in which nodes of traumatic information automatically activate each other (Foa & Kozak, 1986;
Hayes, Van Elzakker, & Shin, 2012). For example, PTSD is thought to contain fear networks in which nodes representing states of arousal (e.g., threats) predispose individuals to interpret events (even innocuous ones) as potential threats. Furthermore, spreading activation in this network leads to the triggering of related threat nodes
that might result in the development of intrusive recollections.
Similar spreading activation mechanisms seem to be work in depression. Specifically, the bias of retrieving negative episodes in depression might be partly due to spreading activation in a network containing strong associations between concepts containing negative memories. Furthermore, recent evidence indicates that different moods, such as a negative mood and rumination, might be the result of spreading
activation mechanisms in an associative memory network (Bar, 2009; Baror & Bar, 2022;
Foster et al., 2011). For example, depressed individuals often focus on specific thoughts (e.g., “Why did I make that bad remark to my friend?”) and make associations about possible consequences of these thoughts (e.g., “Will my friend hate me now?”;
Bar, 2009). We now turn to the evidence on how psychopathology and false memory are linked to each other.
Structure of the Review
To examine whether PTSD and depression are linked with false memory propensity, we conducted a
literature search. We searched the Web of Science database using the following keywords: “PTSD AND false memory.” For depression, we entered the keywords “depression AND false memory.”1
For PTSD, we identified 57 hits. We looked the content of these articles to select those studies in which PTSD patients were tested in a
false memory paradigm. It is interesting that we found that in many of these articles, participants were tested who did not have PTSD but only experienced a traumatic sự kiện (e.g., sexual abuse) and in whom false memory propensity was measured. Because a traumatic precursor is a requirement for PTSD, we will discuss these articles here as well.
We found 12 experimental studies in which PTSD patients underwent some sort of false memory procedure (see
Table 1), and 7 articles were identified that examined the effect of trauma on false memory formation in traumatized participants who were not diagnosed with PTSD. Different false memory tasks were employed, but the DRM procedure was used most frequently. This means that the
findings of our review are mainly centered around the link between spontaneous false memories and PTSD. Furthermore, in those 12 experimental studies, different populations were tested (children, adolescents, and adults).
Overview of Studies
When we concentrated our search on depression and false memory, we found 166 hits. We were specifically interested in studies that addressed false memories in
(sub)clinically depressed individuals. When studies did not have this combination (elicitation of false memories and depressed individuals), we excluded them. Based on this criterion, six articles were identified as being useful for our review (see Table 1). The majority
of these studies employed the DRM paradigm and all included adult participants. Again, this indicates that the results of our review refer mainly to the link between spontaneous false memories and depression. In what follows, we first provide a narrative review of false memory studies for PTSD and depression separately. We will specifically focus on the stimuli that were presented to participants and the impact of this on susceptibility to false memory. Next, we will present an
meta-analysis in which effect sizes are juxtaposed against different types of material.
PTSD, Trauma, and False Memory
A quick glance the studies in which false memory susceptibility was investigated in PTSD patients reveals a rather inconsistent pattern of findings. That is, some studies failed to find a link between PTSD and elevated levels of false memories (e.g.,
Dasse, Juback, Morisette, Dolan, & Weaver, 2015), whereas other studies did obtain this link between PTSD and heightened levels of false memories (e.g., Moradi et al., 2015). Our working hypothesis
was that when confronted with neutral or nonassociative material, PTSD patients should not exhibit greater susceptibility to false memories than healthy comparison participants, but when emotionally associative material is employed, they should be more prone to report false memories.
To understand why, we return to the principle of spreading activation. This principle holds that false memories are more likely to occur when incorrect associations are strong and are made quickly
in a person’s knowledge base; that is, they arise automatically and outside of conscious awareness (Howe et al., 2009). The knowledge base and associative networks of PTSD patients will contain many strong links between concepts referring to negative experiences. Indeed, a hallmark symptom of PTSD is the involuntary occurrence of traumatic intrusions as a
result of spreading activation (Ehlers & Clark, 2000; Hayes et al., 2012). Thus, when PTSD patients are exposed to stimuli that map onto their own knowledge base, they are extremely likely to make rapid associations, producing linkages to nonpresented constructs, leading to relatively high false memory levels for
psychopathology-related information. To be more specific, for PTSD this would indicate that such stimuli should contain negatively valenced or trauma-related details that are closely linked to each other. The DRM paradigm is an excellent method to study this as previous research has made effective use of different, emotionally valenced word lists
(Howe, Candel, Otgaar, Malone, & Wimmer, 2010; Otgaar et al., 2012).
Different types of emotional
When examined more closely, the studies we analyzed did show that PTSD patients show elevated false memory levels for negative- or trauma-related associative material (see Table 2). For example,
Brennen, Dybdahl, and Kapidzic (2007) tested participants with PTSD induced by war-related trauma and traumatized participants without PTSD. Participants were presented with trauma-related DRM lists (e.g., critical lures: blood, concentration camp, war, funeral) and non-trauma-related, neutral DRM lists (e.g., critical lures: sleep,
wedding, child, music). After each list presentation, participants were asked to freely recall all the words they could still recollect. The PTSD group had significantly higher trauma-related false memory levels than the comparison group, whereas the two groups did not differ statistically with respect to neutral false memories.
Effect Sizes of Studies Using Neutral or Non-Associative Material and Studies Using Emotional
In another study, the authors made use of a visual version of the DRM paradigm in which participants were presented with neutral (electrician work), positive (child’s birthday), negative (surveillance), and trauma-related (real-life war) video scenes (Moradi et al., 2015). The videos contained
items that were related to each other and were linked to a related but not presented item (for the trauma video: injured soldier). After the presentation of the videos, military personnel with and without PTSD and a non-trauma-exposed comparison group received a memory recognition task. PTSD participants had higher false recognition rates for the trauma video scenes than the non-PTSD groups. This effect was not seen for the other videos.
Similar results were obtained in a study
that included different types of related pictures (Hayes et al., 2011). In that study, combat veterans diagnosed with PTSD and trauma-exposed comparison participants viewed trauma-related, positive, and neutral pictures. After one week, all participants were involved in a recognition test in which they were also presented with related but
not presented pictures. False memory rates for trauma-related pictures were higher in the PTSD group than in the comparison group. Again, for other types of pictures, groups did not differ in terms of their false memory levels.
An exception to this pattern is a study by Dasse and colleagues (2015), who presented neutral and trauma lists to veterans with and without PTSD. False memory rates did not differ between the groups. However, as the authors noted, the reason for this is
probably that false memory rates were ceiling levels and that more neutral (n = 12) than trauma (n = 4) lists were included in their study, thereby decreasing the chance for trauma-related false memory formation.
Brewin, Huntley, and Whalley (2012) instructed individuals with PTSD to write an account
of their traumatic sự kiện. Participants were also asked to report whether the narrative induced any flashbacks. One week later, they were presented with details of their own and another person’s narrative and had to indicate whether the details were from their own or someone else’s account. Furthermore, participants had to identify whether the details led to flashbacks the time of writing. The majority of individuals with PTSD reported having a flashback for a detail that was not from their
own narrative. This suggests that they erroneously linked a detail from someone else with a flashback of their own.
We now turn to false memory studies that relied on traumatized individuals, of whom it was unknown whether PTSD was present. Like individuals with PTSD, people with traumatic experiences may have formed associative networks of trauma memories. If true, the logical prediction would be that for traumatized people, too, false memory rates are heightened when they
encounter negatively laden or trauma-related material.
Most of the studies in this domain have tested children with a history of maltreatment. Furthermore, in many of these studies, children had faced serious traumatic adversity. Recent studies in this area confirm that, when traumatized, children are presented with trauma-related or negative associative stimuli, false memory rates are heightened (e.g.,
Goodman et al., 2011). For example, Baugerud, Howe, Magnussen, and Melinder (2022) provided maltreated and non-maltreated children with emotionally negative and neutral DRM word lists.
Emotionally negative false memories were easier to induce in maltreated than in non-maltreated children. In another recent study, we also tested maltreated and non-maltreated children (Otgaar, Howe, & Muris, in press). Here, too, participants were provided with emotionally negative and neutral DRM lists. Again, the maltreated group
had higher levels of emotionally negative false memories relative to the non-maltreated group. In the DRM study conducted by Goodman et al. (2011), adolescents and adults with and without documented histories of child sexual abuse were tested. These participants received negative and neutral DRM lists. Participants with a history of trauma
showed higher rates of false memory, especially for the negatively valenced lists.
Of importance, in these studies, there were strong indications that the maltreated children had faced serious adversity. For example, in Baugerud et al.’s (2022) study, children were all removed from their caregivers because of serious
intrafamilial transgressions. In Otgaar et al.’s (in press) study, the maltreated children were recruited from forensic abuse centers or child interrogation settings. Only children for which there were serious signs of abuse would be referred to these places. This is important because if the traumatic status of what children have
experienced is uncertain, it remains difficult to know whether dense and well-integrated associative networks could have been formed. The study of Howe, Toth, and Cicchetti (2011) is a case in point: although all children in the maltreated group had experienced some form of trauma, not all of them had experienced extreme levels of
maltreatment as was the case in more recent studies (Baugerud et al., 2022; Goodman et al., 2011;
Otgaar et al., in press). For example, the sample used in Howe et al. comprised 141 maltreated children, with the majority (75.2%) experiencing neglect, 53.3% emotional maltreatment, 26.2% physical abuse, and 2.8% sexual abuse. Although 58.1% of the maltreated children had experienced more than one subtype of abuse, many in the sample
were not exposed to extreme levels of abuse. Because it was not possible to analyze children’s memory performance as a function of subtype, Howe et al. were unable to ascertain differences in false memory rates as a function of abuse severity. This may explain why in the Howe et al. study false memory levels did not differ statistically between the maltreated and non-maltreated groups of children.
material or nonassociative material
Up until now, we have outlined experimental evidence showing that when people with PTSD or a trauma history are faced with negatively laden or traumatic associative stimuli, negative false memories are likely to be elicited. What happens when PTSD (or traumatized) individuals do not receive trauma-related associative stimuli? We will show that when such stimuli are not presented, false memory patterns in PTSD (and trauma) are inconsistent.
This may have led some memory researchers to conclude that in general there is no link between PTSD and false memory formation.
For example, Triantafyllou, North, Zartman, and Roediger (2015) gave participants with and without PTSD neutral DRM lists. They found that the two groups did not differ
statistically in false memory propensity. Jelinek, Hottenrott, Randjibar, Peters, and Moritz (2009) provided traumatized individuals with and without PTSD and nontraumatized participants with a visual variant of the DRM paradigm, but did not specifically present them with negative or trauma-related visual scenes (for similar results using
videos, see Hauschildt, Peters, Jelinek, & Moritz, 2012). The authors found that false memory propensity was not related to PTSD status. Also, Howe, Cicchetti, Toth, and Cerrito
(2004) noted that maltreatment in children was not associated with false memory susceptibility when using neutral DRM lists.
To elicit false memories, researchers have also resorted to procedures other than the DRM paradigm. For example, there is some limited work on the link between trauma and suggestibility. Eisen and colleagues
(Eisen, Goodman, Qin, Davis, & Crayton, 2007; Eisen, Qin, Goodman, & Davis, 2002) asked children suggestive questions about a forensic medical examination and assessed
whether children with an alleged history of maltreatment were more or less likely to fall prey to such suggestions. The researchers did not find any strong signs that abuse status was linked to accepting suggestive cues (but see Otgaar et al., in press).
Chae, Goodman, Eisen, and Qin (2011) also concluded that trauma and suggestibility were unrelated using a similar approach. Valentino, Cicchetti, Rogosch, and Toth (2008) used a
self-schema memory task and measured true and false recall in maltreated and non-maltreated children. Specifically, children were presented with several words and were asked whether these words referred to them as a person. An unexpected incidental recall test showed that the two groups of children did not differ statistically in false recall.
Some studies relying on neutral or nonassociative material did find evidence that PTSD or trauma is linked to false memories. However,
these might be spurious findings as most studies (k = 7) using neutral material did not find any false memory effects. Furthermore, studies finding heightened false memory rates in traumatized or PTSD participants with neutral material are difficult to interpret. For example, in some of these studies (Bremner, Shobe, & Kihlstrom,
2000; Zoellner, Foa, Brigidi, & Przeworski, 2000), PTSD individuals showed higher neutral false memory rates than individuals without PTSD, but there is no theoretically convincing explanation as to why neutral false memories would be raised in these individuals.
McWilliams, Harris, and Goodman (2014) exposed children and adolescents with and without a history of trauma to several videos and afterward asked several memory-related questions (không lấy phí recall, direct question, suggestive questions). The trauma group was more likely to form spontaneous memory errors when being confronted with direct
questions than the non-trauma-exposed group. However, this result might purely reflect a general tendency to say yes instead of an increase in false memories per se, something that is unlikely to occur with methods that rely on spreading activation such as the DRM paradigm.
Depression and False Memory
The link between depression and memory has originally been examined in the context of
mood congruence effects (Matt, Vazquez, & Campbell, 1992). Mood congruence refers to the phenomenon that stimuli that are similar in affective valence with one’s mood are better encoded and retrieved than stimuli of different valence
(Blaney, 1986). A wealth of studies has confirmed that depressed individuals remember stimuli better when they match their mood (i.e., negative or depression-related stimuli). Associative activation plays a key role in mood congruence effects that have been documented for depression. Thus, mood congruence has been ascribed to associative
activation in an integrated memory network in which nodes and concepts of negative experiences are strongly connected to each other (Foster et al., 2011). This implies that when depressed individuals are presented with associative stimuli that map onto their own associative networks, false memories are likely to be created.
Moritz, Glascher, and Brassen (2005) were among the first researchers to examine false memory creation in depression. Patients with depression and healthy comparison participants were involved in a DRM procedure in which they received depression-related (i.e., loneliness), delusion-related (i.e., betrayal), positive (holiday),
or neutral (window) associative word lists. Moritz and colleagues observed a mood-congruence effect in that false memories for emotionally charged words, especially depression-relevant items, were more likely to occur in depressed patients than in healthy comparison participants. Other studies have replicated this effect.
Joormann, Teachman, and Gotlib (2009) examined the impact of depression on neutral and emotionally negative DRM false memories. Here, too, depressed individuals had elevated levels of emotionally charged false memories compared with a comparison group without depression.
Yeh and Hua (2009) tested patients suffering from a major depressive episode and healthy comparison individuals and presented them with neutral, negative, and positive DRM lists. They found that negative false memories were more easily evoked in patients with a depressive episode than among comparison participants.
Howe and Malone (2011) also tested participants with a major depressive disorder and concluded that depression-relevant critical lures were more likely to be misremembered in those participants than in healthy comparison participants.
So far, the picture is quite clear. When associative negative or depression-related DRM
material is presented to depressed patients, they are more likely to misremember related but not presented items than people with no depression. It is interesting that this effect is not just confined to DRM material but extends to other materials as long as it is associative in nature. A notable example is the study by Toffalini, Mirandola, Drabik, Melinder,
and Cornoldi (2014). Their study did not rely on a clinical sample but on participants scoring high and low on depressive-anxious personality traits. Participants received pictures depicting scripts of everyday experiences (e.g., family dinner, going shopping). Each script contained a sequence of several pictures referring to typical actions that are likely to take place in that particular experience. For half of the participants, some pictures depicted a negative outcome of the experience
(e.g., bike accident of a boy), whereas the other half received pictures with a neutral outcome. During a recognition task, participants were exposed to presented and nonpresented pictures. It is important that for some of the nonpresented pictures, a cause (e.g., boy crossing the road) was depicted of the negative/neutral outcome that was shown in the picture. In the high depressive-anxious group, causal false memories for the negative outcome were more likely to be elicited than for the
neutral outcome and that this was not the case in the low depressive-anxious group.
To summarize, these studies have revealed a consistent pattern. In line with the notion of associative activation, depressed individuals are particularly prone to the formation of negatively valenced or depression-related false memories. The explanation for this is that depressed individuals are biased toward the retrieval of negative experiences because of increased associative activation of
that information in their knowledge base. So, when they are confronted with negative or depression-related information that is associative in nature, they are more likely to spontaneously make incorrect associations than healthy comparison individuals.
A stronger case could be made for the idea that associative activation underlies raised levels of false memory creation in PTSD,
trauma, and depression by performing a meta-analysis on the effect sizes reported in the pertinent studies. There are several routes that can be taken here. First, one could look the categories (PTSD, trauma, and depression) separately and examine the effect sizes per stimulus type for each distinct type of psychopathology. However, there are several limitations with this strategy. To begin with, there are only a few studies per category (i.e., PTSD, trauma, and depression). Combining them
would provide a better and more general estimate of the effects of certain forms of psychopathology on false memory production. Furthermore, when performing such an analysis, it would be informative to contrast effect sizes from studies using negative or trauma-related associative material with those from studies using neutral or nonassociative material. Unfortunately, this cannot be done with studies on depression and false memory because these studies have only used associative material.
With these considerations in mind, we decided to take a second route in performing a meta-analysis (see Table 2; see also the
Supplemental Material available trực tuyến and
://osf.io/fdfpj/ for all materials and analyses). To this end, we have combined studies that looked false memory formation in PTSD, trauma, and depression. Of course, one limitation here is that studies differ on certain dimensions such as the paradigm used or which memory test was
employed (recall vs. recognition). We have categorized these studies in terms of those using associative and emotional material (e.g., negative, depression-relevant) and those using neutral or nonassociative material. We then compared effect sizes between these two categories. We have chosen Cohen’s d as our effect size of interest as this effect size represented how large the effect was regarding false memory rates when certain stimuli were presented (e.g., neutral or emotional
associative material) between two groups (e.g., PTSD vs. control). For some studies (k = 9), no Cohen’s d could be calculated because the relevant information was not described in the text. We emailed the authors of these studies, and from one of those, we received the relevant information. Of the remaining studies, authors did not respond (k = 6) or did not have the data anymore (k = 2). Furthermore, for some studies, we have added multiple effect sizes,
namely, in those cases where false memories were measured in more than one way (e.g., incorrect details in không lấy phí recall, spontaneous memory errors or errors of commission).
We performed an independent samples Welch t test on the effect sizes with type of stimuli as a between-subjects variable (Delacre, Lakens, & Leys, in press). As
expected, when participants were presented with emotional associative stimuli, effect sizes were statistically higher (M = 0.90, SD = 0.47) than when neutral or nonassociative material was presented (M = −0.07, SD = 0.32), Welch t(19.2) = 5.74, p. < .001, d = 2.07. When we included the Dasse et al.’s (2015) study with an effect size of zero (see earlier discussion), we still found statistically higher effect sizes for emotional
associative material (M = 0.83, SD = 0.52) than for neutral or nonassociative material (M = −0.7, SD = 0.47), Welch t(20) = 5.09, p. < .001, d = 1.85. Furthermore, a Bayesian analysis of the data (without the Dasse et al.’s study) using a prior of 0.71 revealed a Bayes factor (BF10) of 13001, indicating that our data are more in favor of the alternative hypothesis than the null (i.e., no difference) hypothesis.
Our meta-analysis supports our narrative review that PTSD, trauma history, and depression go along with an increased susceptibility to false memories but only when the stimuli map onto a psychopathology-related knowledge base. So, when individuals with depression or PTSD were presented with neutral or nonassociative stimuli, on average, they were not more susceptible to false memories related to that material than comparison participants. However, when emotional associative
material was presented, false memories linked to that material increased particularly in individuals with PTSD (or trauma) and depression relative to comparison participants.
We also examined whether our results might suffer from publication bias. First, we contacted all first authors of the articles included in this review and asked for any unpublished work on the link between false memory and depression, PTSD, or a history of trauma. Two researchers responded but no
unpublished data was present. Second, we conducted a p.-curve analysis to examine the existence of publication bias and examine whether our results show any evidential value (Simonsohn, Nelson, & Simmons, 2014). P-curve refers to the distribution of statistically significant p. values for a certain number of
studies. A p.-curve reflects evidential value when the curve is right-skewed so that there are more low (e.g., .01) than high (e.g., .045) p. values. As can be seen from Figure 1, our analyzed p.-curve is right-skewed implying
evidential value and suggests that there are no signs of publication bias.
P-curve analysis of the reported studies on the link among false memory and depression, PTSD, or a history of trauma.
Discussion and Conclusion
Associative activation is a key mechanism underlying false memory propensity and omnipresent in psychopathological conditions such as PTSD and depression. When this mechanism is taken
into account in studies examining PTSD, depression, and false memories, we suggest that individuals with either PTSD or depression rapidly and automatically activate associations when they are confronted with pathology-related emotional experiences. The consequence of this automatic activation is that false memories for emotional material are more likely to be generated (also see
Zhang et al., in press).
In Figure 2, we have depicted a hypothetical example of
what happens when emotional associative or neutral material is presented to an individual with PTSD. Although the associative network is simple and for illustrative purposes only, it does show that it contains many nodes/concepts that are highly interconnected with each other. Furthermore, these nodes can represent previously related negative experiences or recollections (e.g., abuse), but they can also reflect feelings (e.g., anger) that are related to a negative experience. Thus, an
associative network or knowledge base can contain a multitude of linkages (e.g., semantic, phonological) between different pieces of information (e.g., recollections, emotions; Bower, 1981;
Foa & Kozak, 1986; Howe et al., 2010). This perspective is closely aligned with other conceptualizations of how memory and emotions are linked such as the associative network
theory of memory and emotion (Bower, 1981; Pessoa, 2022). This network theory assumes that nodes can represent myriad types of information such as recollective information but also
different types of emotions.
Hypothetical example of how false memories in PTSD are formed when emotional associative material is presented.
For example, when someone with PTSD is confronted with a negative related experience (in this example, a negative DRM list), encoding the list items will activate already existing nodes (e.g., cut) and will automatically activate related nodes as well (e.g., rape). Through this associative cascade, nodes can
become activated that were not experienced and this may generate false memories (i.e., blood). As can also be seen in the figure, the creation of a false memory is unlikely to occur when neutral material is presented. Although some items of that material (e.g., red) are similar to negative-related items, other items are less likely to activate nodes in someone’s knowledge base, thereby reducing the chance that associative activation will spread to neighboring nodes leading to false memories.
A similar example can be drawn for the relationship between depression or trauma and false memories. The key premise is that for individuals with PTSD (or those who have experienced a traumatic sự kiện) or depression, their basic activation levels are already geared toward processing emotionally related experiences. The net result of this memory bias is that the processing of other emotionally related experiences during encoding is facilitated. It is interesting that associative
activation that facilitates remembering true emotional experiences in individuals with PTSD, a traumatic history, or depression is the same time an important player in the remembrance of false emotional experiences. Indeed, as Howe and Malone (2011, p.. 199) argued, “This may represent a double-edged sword—the ease with which true
memories of negative . . . experiences come to mind may also increase with the ease with which false recollections become confused with reality.”
Our core finding concerning elevated false memories in people with PTSD, depression, or a trauma history fits well with organizational principles of how memory is constructed. Associative networks in people with trauma PTSD or depression could be organized roughly in a similar manner as those in people who have acquired a specific
expertise. For example, baseball experts can recollect enormous amounts of information related to baseball (Voss, Vesonder, & Spilich, 1980), and chess experts can retrieve the precise locations of chess pieces that occurred during a chess trò chơi
(Chase & Simon, 1973). However, as is the case with people who suffer from PTSD, trauma, or depression, research on expertise has demonstrated that superior skills can increase susceptibility to false memory errors. For example,
Castel, McCabe, Roediger, and Heitman (2007) presented participants who had high or low knowledge of American football a list of familiar animal names (e.g., lions, broncos, bears) that were also the names of famous football teams. The authors found that the high knowledge group falsely recalled more football-related names (e.g., eagles)
than the low knowledge group. Similar mechanisms might be work in individuals with PTSD, a trauma history, or depression.
The notion that individuals with PTSD, a history of trauma, or depression are more likely to produce emotionally related false memories when confronted with affective rather than neutral stimuli parallels previous work on the processing of emotional stimuli in these individuals. Specifically, an abundance of studies has shown that individuals with PTSD
take longer on a Stroop task to color-name trauma-related words than neutral words (e.g., Foa, Feske, Murdock, Kozak, & McCarthy, 1991; McNally, Kaspi, Riemann, & Zeitlin,
1990). This attentional bias reflects an activated associative network that prioritizes threatening information. Such attentional bias might be relevant in the context of false memory effects because it may well be the case that such effects represent false alarms associated with a semantic network that is highly activated.
Although we have emphasized the role of associative activation in this review, other memory-related mechanisms are likely to play a role in false
memories as well. That is, associative activation is most likely to impact the encoding of certain experiences, but retrieval mechanisms are also relevant for false memories (Roediger, Balota, & Watson, 2001). One promising candidate that affects retrieval of false memories is cognitive control. Studies show that both PTSD and depression are characterized by deficiencies in working memory, which is thought to undermine cognitive control
(Engle & Kane, 2003; Joormann & Gotlib, 2007;
Rose & Ebmeier, 2006; Schweizer & Dalgleish, 2011). This implies that when associative activation has led to the activation of nonexperienced nodes, individuals with
PTSD, trauma-related histories, or depression may have difficulties in inhibiting false memories because of poor cognitive control (see, e.g., Kimball & Bjork, 2002). When this activation cannot be inhibited, false memories are easily produced. This line of reasoning fits well with research showing that poor working memory is
associated with increased levels of false recollections (e.g., Peters, Jelicic, Verbeek, & Merckelbach, 2007).
It is also relevant to examine whether the results of our review can be explained in terms of alternative false memory theories such as FTT. To reiterate, FTT posits that false memories are the consequences of gist extraction
when verbatim traces can no longer be retrieved. If this principle is integrated in the current review, then individuals with PTSD, a history of trauma, or depression are more likely to rely on the gist or semantics when retrieving memories. It is true that such individuals have deficiencies in item-specific processing and the retrieval of verbatim traces
(Hayes et al., 2011). So, gist traces are then indeed more likely to be retrieved, promoting false memory creation. However, in our view, FTT cannot explain the finding that people with PTSD, depression, or a traumatic history have a memory bias toward a plethora of different types of memories, including autobiographical ones, and not just
semantic ones. Moreover, if verbatim processes are a primary source of true memories and gist processes the primary source of false memories, how can it be that both true and false memories increase for psychopathology-congruent materials? Furthermore, traumatized or depressed individuals are often haunted with rumination and intrusive recollections and a diverse set of negative emotions. This cascade of different symptoms is difficult to explain solely in terms of gist extraction. Hence, the
finding that such individuals have a diverse set of emotionally related memories is better accommodated by associative activation theories (AAT and AMT).
Other Forms of Psychopathology and False Memory
In the present review, we have focused on disorders (PTSD, depression) or precursors of disorders (trauma) in which memory aberrations have been well documented. PTSD and depression are often
regarded as disorders in which autobiographical memory aberrations are a key feature (Dalgleish & Werner-Seidler, 2014; Rubin et al., 2008). Arguably, associative activation as
a principal factor in the development of false memories only possesses relevance for disorders in which memory aberrations are central to the symptomatology. We will now show that if we look evidence for other memory-related disorders and false memory propensity, then our theoretical principle still holds.
One disorder in which memory deficits are of central importance is schizophrenia. The memory deficits here might be linked to reality distortion. There is an abundance of
evidence showing that episodic memory is severely compromised in patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (Aleman et al., 1999; Heinrichs & Zakzanis, 1998). Based on this, one
might expect that false memory rates are elevated in schizophrenic patients. However, the picture is much more complex concerning the impact of schizophrenia on the creation of false memories.
In line with our review, recent evidence shows that false memories can become elevated in schizophrenic patients when the method used to elicit false memories aligns with specific symptoms of schizophrenia. For example, one core symptom of schizophrenia is delusions. Delusions have been
regarded as originating from a dysfunction in cognitive systems related to memory (McKenna, 1991). Bhatt, Laws, and McKenna (2010) recently advanced the idea that delusions have
strong similarities with false memories in that both refer to phenomena that are experienced as true but lack reality. In their study, they tested schizophrenic patients who were currently experiencing delusions, patients not experiencing delusions, and healthy comparison participants. The participants were provided with several DRM word lists and the authors found that false memory rates were highest in the delusion group (for similar results, see
Laws & Bhatt, 2005). It is important that studies in which procedures used to elicit false memories did not relate to specific symptomatology have failed to find increased false memory levels in schizophrenic patients (e.g.,
Moritz, Woodward, Cuttler, Whitman, & Watson, 2004).
Another strong case for the role of associative activation in the link between psychopathology and false memory is to identify disorders with deficits in emotional processing and emotional memory retrieval. For example, a deviant processing of emotions and emotional
memories is a characteristic feature of conduct disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and psychopathy (e.g., Dolan & Fullam, 2010; Glass & Newman, 2009). Individuals with these disorders display less automatic associative activation in their knowledge base regarding emotionally negative memories than individuals without these
disorders. Based on this observation, one would expect that in these disorders, emotionally related false memories are less likely to occur than in disorders such as PTSD. In fact, there is evidence that points in this direction. Specifically, Thijssen, Otgaar, Howe, and de Ruiter (2013) tested children scoring high and low on
callous-unemotional (CU) traits, which closely resemble the emotional detachment part of psychopathy in adult forensic populations (Frick, 2006). These children were presented with neutral and emotionally negative DRM word lists. In line with our prediction, children with high CU traits were least susceptible to the production of false
memories for emotionally negative word lists.
Psychopathology in Practice
A relevant issue is whether our meta-analytic findings might be informative for practical settings such as the clinical or forensic field. It is important to emphasize here that the current article was mainly focused on the link between spontaneous false memory as evoked by the DRM procedure and certain forms
of psychopathology. Hence, we urge caution in generalizing our findings to domains outside the realm of spontaneous false memory such as issues concerning false memories elicited by external suggestive pressure.
Nonetheless, memory scholars have regularly articulated that the events (e.g., birthday party) that we experience daily consist of interrelated and meaning-based details (e.g., presents, singing, cake). Spontaneous false memories are readily produced when people rely on
the underlying meaning of such events. For more forensically related experiences, one might expect the same. Indeed, Holliday, Reyna, and Brainerd (2008) argued that “false memories induced by meaning related information embody several features of forensically relevant memories. For child witnesses of domestic violence, for example, such violence is not
usually a single episode but rather a series of repeated events that are substantially similar but not exactly the same” (p.. 76).
Many individuals with psychopathology are treated for their disorders and during these therapeutic interventions, such individuals often have to retrieve memories that are related to their specific problems. For example, a patient with PTSD might be asked to recall (parts of) the traumatic sự kiện after which a treatment plan is set up. Or a patient
with depression might talk about his or her ruminations after which a therapist focuses on these repetitive topics.
The heated debate about recovered memories in the nineties revolved around the existence of repression and whether certain therapies might have caused clients to misremember entire episodes of sexual abuse (Lindsay & Read,
1994; Loftus, 1994). Typically, clients with recovered memories suffered from some form of psychopathological symptomatology and were motivated to know the origins of their symptoms (Ost et al.,
2002). In some of these cases, clinicians suggested that a buried traumatic sự kiện might underlie symptoms, and clients were swayed into falsely believing and remembering that they were traumatized in their past (Loftus & Ketcham, 1994).
Inspired by the recovered memory debate, a plethora of research has been conducted on the
elicitation of false memories (e.g., Frenda, Nichols, & Loftus, 2011). Although these studies have been informative (Otgaar, Merckelbach, Jelicic, & Smeets, 2022), some memory researchers have
remained critical about the generalizability of their findings (e.g., Pezdek & Lam, 2007; but see Wade et al., 2007). In many of these studies, healthy participants were
tested using a variety of different false memory procedures. Although this work has demonstrated the relative ease with which false memories can be generated using different manipulations (e.g., suggestive techniques), it is not always clear how these findings can be translated to clinical settings in which patients with psychopathology are risk of being confronted with suggestive pressure, potentially leading to the formation of false memories.
More important, based on the
recovered memory debate, research intensified in the area of suggestion-induced false memories. The focus in these studies was to examine the impact of suggestive prompts on memory. Although this work has undoubtedly revealed that suggestion can contaminate memory and that this can be perilous in therapeutic settings, our review raises the important question of whether the potential danger of spontaneous false memory formation has been neglected in the clinical field.
popular treatment techniques have a specific focus on asking patients psychopathology-related questions. More specifically, many therapeutic interventions intend to change maladaptive autobiographical memories. For example, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR; Shapiro, 1995;
Van den Hout & Engelhard, 2012) is a popular intervention for dealing with trauma. During EMDR, patients have to retrieve their traumatic memories after which they receive bilateral stimulation in the form of, for example, saccadic eye movements. This procedure taxes working memory, and because of this, the emotional component of the traumatic memory
loses some of its value. It is important that during EMDR, patients are exposed to a cascade of questions related to their traumatic memories. Based on our review, one prediction would be that individuals with PTSD, depression, or a trauma history may then be especially prone to the creation of false memories (Howe & Malone, 2011; Otgaar et al., in press).
Furthermore, memory scholars have recently begun to acknowledge that therapies might change memories. For example, Lane, Ryan, Nadel, and
Greenberg (2015) stated that “transformation of memories happens all the time, like it or not, and the point of psychotherapy should be to harness this naturally occurring phenomenon for good purpose” (p.. 45). Furthermore, Brewin (2015, p.. 21) postulated that “psychotherapy creates new memories.” Meanwhile, many therapists have
inadequate knowledge about concepts such as repression and false memories (Ost, Easton, Hope, French, & Wright, 2022; Patihis et al., 2014). This knowledge, however, is vital
to therapists whose aim is to restructure their patients’ autobiographical memories by using EMDR (Holmes & Mathews, 2010). Therapists, cues that tap into the dominant knowledge network, and patients with certain forms of psychopathology (e.g., PTSD) can create a dangerous triad in which false memory formation is lurking any corner
in this triangle. With this in mind, it is surprising that the literature on “negative” side effects—including spontaneous false memories—of therapeutic interventions is so limited (see Jonsson, Alaie, Parling, & Arnberg, 2014;
A Look Into the Future
Our review suggests that spontaneous false memory creation is easily evoked in PTSD, depression, and traumatized people if the stimuli being presented are associative and emotional in nature.
The studies that have been conducted regarding psychopathology and false memory frequently included the DRM paradigm. Although we have just described how the findings from these DRM studies can be relevant in practical settings, it is undeniably true that the DRM paradigm suffers from one significant limitation. That is, the DRM paradigm does not concentrate on false autobiographical memories, which are the memories that were debated during the memory wars and that are most relevant in
therapeutic and forensic settings.
There is discussion about whether false memory proneness as tapped by the DRM technique is positively related to susceptibility to false autobiographical memories. Although studies show that DRM false memories can be relevant in forensic settings when spontaneous statements are the foreground of a police investigation
(Brackmann et al., 2022; Brainerd, Reyna, & Zember, 2011;
Otgaar et al., 2022), there are also studies showing that DRM false memories are not that relevant in practical situations because they are not, or only weakly, related to other types of false memories (Ost et al., 2013; Otgaar & Candel, 2010; Zhu, Chen, Loftus, Lin, & Dong, 2013). This latter finding would imply that different mechanisms are play in different
variants of false memories (but see also Rubin & Talarico, 2009).
Psychopathology and suggestibility
The field of psychopathology and false memory is in urgent need of false memory studies that use procedures that are most likely to
occur in practical settings such as in a treatment context (Scoboria et al., 2022). One obvious example would be paradigms using some form of external suggestion like the misinformation or implantation paradigm. These suggestions are likely to be encountered in clinical situations or other practically relevant situations (e.g., police
investigations). Considering the importance of such studies, it is surprising that virtually no research base exists in which suggestion-induced false memories are examined in people with psychopathology. In our review, we only encountered limited work in which the link between trauma and suggestibility was examined (Chae et al., 2011; Eisen et al., 2002; Eisen et al., 2007).
Peters, Moritz, Tekin, Jelicic, and Merckelbach (2012) examined the effects of misleading information on false memory in schizophrenic patients and found that people with schizophrenia showed a tendency to go along with misleading information. Otgaar and colleagues (in press) recently tested maltreated and non-maltreated children’s
ability to accept or resist external misinformation. They found that maltreated children were less prone to the misinformation effect than non-maltreated ones.
Although these studies have provided some important insights, they are limited in the sense that they have not taken into account a theoretical principle that has been the focus of the current investigation. That is, in these studies, the offered suggestions were perhaps not specifically related to the associative
networks of the participants. Our prediction is that future studies that do present external suggestions that map into someone’s knowledge base will show enhanced false memory rates. Based on the current review, we expect that when, for example, PTSD patients view negatively related associative stimuli such as an aversive video and are then misinformed that certain negatively related details were present, they would be more susceptible to endorsing those suggestions than healthy comparison
participants. When these conditions are not met, then it is likely that PTSD patients and comparison participants will not differ in their susceptibility to suggestive pressure.
The current synopsis commenced with an often-heard claim among researchers that there is an inconsistent pattern concerning the link between psychopathology and false memory. We demonstrate,
for the first time, that this pattern is quite consistent as long as we glance through the lens of associative activation. For individuals with PTSD, depression, and a history of trauma, false memory susceptibility increases when they are exposed to associative material that is linked to their knowledge base. Indeed, what this review shows is that researchers may have underestimated the occurrence of false memories in treatment settings. Whereas suggestion-induced false memories can certainly
occur in these settings, spontaneous false memories are easily created for individuals with these types of psychopathologies. This surely indicates that these individuals are cursed in that the mechanisms leading to their symptomatology also lead to the occurrence of false memories, which might be harmful in legal and clinical settings.
of using the term “false memory,” we also used the search terms “false recollection,” “pseudo memory,” “memory distortion,” and “memory error” together with the search term “PTSD” or “depression.” However, no new studies were identified using these new terms.
Aleman A., Hijman R., De Haan E. H. F., Kahn R. S. (1999).
Memory impairment in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1358–1366. [PubMed]
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Anderson J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 22, 261–295. [Google Scholar]
Arntz A. (2012). Imagery rescripting as a therapeutic technique: Review of clinical trials, basic studies, and research agenda. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 3, 189–208.
Balota D. A., Duchek J. M. (1989). Spreading activation in episodic memory: Further evidence for age independence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 849–876. [PubMed]
Bar M. (2009). A cognitive neuroscience hypothesis of mood and depression. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 456–463. [PMC free article]
Baror S., Bar M. (2022).
Associative activation and its relation to exploration and exploitation in the brain. Psychological Science, 27, 776–789. [PubMed]
Baugerud G. A., Howe M. L., Magnussen S., Melinder A. (2022). Maltreated and non-maltreated children’s true and false memories of neutral and emotional word lists in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 143, 102–110.
Beblo T., Fernando S., Klocke S., Griepenstroh J., Aschenbrenner S., Driessen M. (2012). Increased suppression of negative and positive emotions in major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 141, 474–479.
Bhatt R., Laws K. R., McKenna P. J. (2010). False memory in schizophrenia patients with and without delusions. Psychiatry Research, 178, 260–265.
Bifulco A., Brown G. W., Adler Z. (1991). Early sexual abuse and depression in adult life. British Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 115–122. [PubMed]
Blaney P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 229–246. [PubMed]
Bookbinder S. H., Brainerd C. J. (2022). Emotion and
false memory: The context-content paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1315–1351. [PubMed]
Borsboom D., Cramer A. O. J. (2014). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91–121. [PubMed]
Bower G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148. [PubMed]
Brackmann N., Otgaar H., Sauerland M., Jelicic M. (2022). When
children are the least vulnerable to false memories: A true report or a case of autosuggestion. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 61, S271–S275. [PubMed]
Brainerd C. J., Reyna V. F., Ceci S. J. (2008). Developmental reversals in false memory: A review of data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 343–382.
Brainerd C. J., Reyna V. F., Zember E. (2011). Theoretical and forensic implications of developmental studies of the DRM illusion. Memory & Cognition, 39, 365–380. [PubMed]
Bremner J. D., Shobe K. K., Kihlstrom J. F. (2000). False memories in women with self-reported childhood sexual abuse: An empirical study. Psychological Science, 11, 333–337. [PubMed]
Brennen T., Dybdahl R., Kapidzic A. (2007). Trauma-related and neutral false memories in war-induced posttraumatic stress disorder. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 877–885. [PubMed]
Brewin C. R. (2014). Episodic memory, perceptual memory, and their interaction: Foundations for a theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 69–97. [PubMed]
Brewin C. R. (2015). Reconsolidation versus retrieval competition: Rival hypotheses to explain memory change in psychotherapy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, 21–22. [PubMed]
Brewin C. R., Dalgleish T., Joseph S. (1996). A dual representation of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Review, 103, 670–686. [PubMed]
Brewin C. R., Huntley Z., Whalley M. G. (2012). Source memory errors associated with reports of posttraumatic flashbacks: A proof of concept study. Cognition, 124, 234–238. [PMC free article]
Calvillo D. P., Parong J. A. (2022). The misinformation effect is unrelated to the DRM effect with and without a DRM warning. Memory, 24, 324–333. [PubMed]
Castel A. D., McCabe D. P., Roediger H. L., Heitman J. L. (2007). The dark side of expertise: Domain-specific memory errors. Psychological Science, 18, 3–5. [PubMed]
Chae Y., Goodman G. S., Eisen M. L., Qin J. (2011). Event memory and suggestibility in abused and neglected children: Trauma-related psychopathology and cognitive functioning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 520–538.
Chase W. G., Simon H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.
Collins A. M., Loftus E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation
theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.
Dalgleish T., Werner-Seidler A.
(2014). Disruptions in autobiographical memory processing in depression and the emergence of memory therapeutics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 596–604. [PubMed]
Dalgleish T., Yiend J. (2006). The effects of suppressing a negative autobiographical memory on concurrent intrusions and subsequent autobiographical recall in dysphoria. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 467–473.
Dasse M. N., Juback S. K., Morisette S. B., Dolan S. L., Weaver C. A. (2015). False memory susceptibility in OEF/OIF veterans with and without PTSD. Military Psychology, 27, 354–365.
Deese J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22.
Delacre M., Lakens D., Leys C. (in press). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology.
Dolan M. C., Fullam R. (2005). Memory for emotional events in violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1657–1667.
Ehlers A., Clark D. M. (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 319–345. [PubMed]
Eisen M. L.,
Goodman G. S., Qin J., Davis S., Crayton J. (2007). Maltreated children’s memory: Accuracy, suggestibility, and psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1275–1294. [PubMed]
Eisen M. L., Qin J., Goodman G. S., Davis S. L. (2002). Memory and suggestibility in maltreated children: Age, stress arousal, dissociation, and psychopathology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 167–212.
Engle R. W., Kane M. J. (2003). Executive control, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 145–199.
Finley J. R., Sungkhasettee, Roediger H. L., Balota D. A. (2022). Relative contributions of semantic and phonological associates to over-additive false recall in hybrid DRM lists. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 154–168.
Foa E. B., Feske U., Murdock T. B., Kozak M., McCarthy M. J. (1991). Processing of threat-related information in rape victims. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 156–162.
Foa E. B., Kozak M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 20–35.
S., Yung R. C., Branch K. K., Stringer K., Ferguson B. J., Sullivan W., Drago V. (2011). Increased spreading activation in depression. Brain and Cognition, 77, 265–270. [PubMed]
Frenda S. J., Nichols R. M., Loftus E. F. (2011). Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 20–23.
Frick P. J. (2006). Developmental pathways to conduct disorder. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15, 311–331. [PubMed]
Fried E. I.,
Cramer A. O. J. (in press). Moving forward: Challenges and directions for psychopathological network theory and methodology. Perspectives on Psychological Science. [PubMed]
Glass S. J.,
Newman J. P. (2009). Emotion processing in the criminal psychopath: The role of attention in emotion-facilitated memory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 229–234. [PMC free article]
Goodman G. S., Ogle C. M., Block S. D., Harris L. S., Larson R. P., Augusti E., . . . Urquiza A. (2011). False memory for trauma-related Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists in adolescents and adults with histories of child sexual abuse. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 423–438. [PMC free article]
Gotlib I. H., Joormann J. (2010). Cognition and depression: Current status and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 285–312.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]
Hauschildt M., Peters M. J. V., Jelinek L., Moritz S. (2012). Veridical and false memory for scenic material in posttraumatic stress disorder. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 80–89. [PubMed]
Hayes J. P., LaBar K. S., McCarthy G., Selgrade E., Nasser J., Dolcos F., Morey R. A. (2011). Reduced hippocampal and amygdala activity predicts memory distortions for trauma reminders in combat-related PTSD. Journal of Psychiatric
Research, 45, 660–669. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Hayes J. P., Van Elzakker M. B., Shin L. M. (2012). Emotion and cognition interactions in PTSD: A review of neurocognitive and neuroimaging studies. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 1–14.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]
Hayne H., Gross J. (2022). Memory by association: Integrating memories prolongs retention by two-year-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 46, 7–13.
Heinrichs W. R., Zakzanis K. K. (1998). Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: A quantitative review of the evidence. Neuropsychology, 12, 426–445. [PubMed]
Hertel P. T., Brozovich F. (2010). Cognitive habits and memory distortions in anxiety and depression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 155–160. [Google Scholar]
Holliday R. E., Reyna V. F., Brainerd C. J. (2008). Recall of details never experienced: Effects of age, repetition, and semantic cues. Cognitive Development, 23, 67–78.
Holmes E. A., Mathews A. (2010). Mental imagery in emotion and emotional disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 349–362. [PubMed]
Howe M. L.
(2008). What is false memory development the development of? Comment on Brainerd, Reyna, and Ceci (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 134, 768–772. [PubMed]
Howe M. L., Candel I., Otgaar H., Malone C. M., Wimmer M. C. (2010). Valence and the development of immediate and long-term false memory illusions. Memory, 18, 58–75. [PubMed]
Howe M. L., Cicchetti D., Toth S. L., Cerrito B. M. (2004). True and false memories in maltreated children. Child Development, 75, 1402–1417.
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Howe M. L., Garner S. R., Charlesworth M., Knott L. M. (2011). A brighter side to memory illusions: False memories prime children’s and adults’ insight-based problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 383–393.
Howe M. L., Knott L. M. (2015). The fallibility of memory in judicial processes: Lessons from the past and their modern consequences. Memory, 23, 633–656.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]
Howe M. L., Knott L. M., Conway M. A. (2022). Memory and miscarriages of justice. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
Howe M. L., Malone C. (2011). Mood-congruent true and false memory: Effects of
depression. Memory, 19, 192–201. [PubMed]
Howe M. L., Toth S. L.,
Cicchetti D. (2011). Can maltreated children inhibit true and false memories for emotional information? Child Development, 82, 967–981. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Howe M. L., Wilkinson S., Monaghan P. (2012, November). False memories trump true ones as problem-solving primes after a delay. Paper presented as part of the Governing Board Invited Symposium, Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MN.
Howe M. L., Wimmer M. C., Gagnon N., Plumpton S.
(2009). An associative-activation theory of children’s and adults’ memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 229–251.
Hutchinson K. A. (2003). Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 785–813.
Jelinek L., Hottenrott B., Randjibar S., Peters M. J., Moritz S. (2009). Visual false memories in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40, 374–383. [PubMed]
Jonsson U., Alaie I., Parling T., Arnberg F. K. (2014). Reporting of harms in randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions for mental and behavioral disorders: A review of current practice. Contemporary Clinical Trials,
38, 1–8. [PubMed]
Joormann J., Gotlib I. H. (2007). Selective attention to emotional faces recovering from depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 80–85.
Joormann J., Siemer M. (2004). Memory accessibility, mood regulation, and dysphoria: Difficulties in repairing sad mood with happy memories? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 179–188. [PubMed]
Joormann J., Siemer M., Gotlib I. H. (2007). Mood regulation in depression: Differential effects of distraction and recall of happy memories on sad mood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 484–490.
Joormann J., Teachman B. A., Gotlib I. H. (2009). Sadder and less accurate? False memory for negative material in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 412–417.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]
Kimball D. R., Bjork R. A. (2002). Influences of intentional and unintentional forgetting on false memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 116–130. [PubMed]
Kiser L. J., Heston J., Millsap P. A., Pruitt D. B. (1991). Physical and sexual abuse in childhood: Relationship with post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 776–783.
Koriat A., Goldsmith M., Pansky A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537.
Lane R. D., Ryan L.,
Nadel L., Greenberg L. (2015). Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, 1–64. [PubMed]
Laws K. R., Bhatt R. (2005). False memories and delusional ideation in normal healthy subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 775–781.
Lilienfeld S. O. (2007). Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 53–70. [PubMed]
Lindsay D. S., Johnson M. K.,
Kwon P. (1991). Developmental changes in memory source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52, 297–318. [PubMed]
Lindsay D. S., Read J. D. (1994). Psychotherapy and memories of childhood sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 281–338. [Google Scholar]
Loftus E. F. (1994). The repressed memory controversy. American Psychologist, 49, 443–445.
Loftus E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A
30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12, 361–366. [PubMed]
Loftus E. F., Ketcham K. (1994). The myth of repressed memory. Tp New York, NY: St. Martin’s. [Google Scholar]
E. F., Pickrell J. E. (1995). The formation of false memories. Psychiatric Annals, 25, 720–725.
Maran M. (2012). My lie. A true story of false
memory. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
Mathews A., MacLeod C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional
disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 167–195. [PubMed]
Matt G. E., Vazquez C.,
Campbell W. K. (1992). Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 227–255.
McKenna P. J. (1991). Memory, knowledge, and delusions. British Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 36–41. [PubMed]
McNally R. J. (2003). Remembering trauma.
Cambridge, MA: Belknap. [Google Scholar]
McNally R. J., Kaspi S. P., Riemann B. C, Zeitlin S. B. (1990). Selective processing of threat cues in
posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 398–402. [PubMed]
McNally R. J., Robinaugh D. J., Wu G. W. Y., Wang L., Deserno M. K., Borsboom D. (2015). Mental disorders as causal systems: A network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 836–849.
McWilliams K., Harris L. S., Goodman G. S. (2014). Child maltreatment, trauma-related psychopathology, and eyewitness memory in children and adolescents. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 32, 702–717. [PubMed]
Meyer T., Smeets T., Giesbrecht T., Quaedflieg C. W., Girardelli M. M., Mackay G. R., Merckelbach H. (2013). Individual differences in spatial configuration learning predict the occurrence of intrusive memories. Cognitive, Affective, &
Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 186–196. [PubMed]
Moradi A. R., Heydari A. H., Abdollahi M. H., Rahimi-Movaghar V., Dalgleish T., Jobson L. (2015). Visual false memories in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 905–917.
Moritz S., Voigt K., Arzola G. M., Otte C. (2008). When the half-full glass is appraised as half empty and memorised as completely empty: Mood-congruent true and false recognition in depression is modulated by salience. Memory,
16, 810–820. [PubMed]
Moritz S., Glascher J., Brassen S. (2005). Investigation of mood-congruent false and true memory recognition in depression. Depression and Anxiety, 21, 9–17. [PubMed]
Moritz S., Woodward T. S., Cuttler C., Whitman J. C., Watson J. M. (2004). False memories in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology, 18, 276–283. [PubMed]
Neely J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254.
Nigro G., Neisser U. (1983). Point of view in personal memories. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 467–482.
Ono M., Devilly G. J., Shum D. H. K. (2022). A
meta-analytic review of overgeneral memory: The role of trauma history, mood, and the presence of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 8, 157–164. [PubMed]
Ost J., Blank H., Davies J., Jones G., Lambert K., Salmon K. (2013). False memory ≠ false memory: DRM errors are unrelated to the misinformation effect. PLoS ONE, 8, e57939.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]
Ost J., Costall A., Bull R. (2002). A perfect symmetry? A study of retractors’ experiences of making and then repudiating claims of early sexual abuse. Psychology, Crime & Law, 8, 155–181.
Ost J., Easton S., Hope L., French C. C., Wright D. B. (2022). Latent variables underlying the memory beliefs of chartered clinical psychologists, hypnotherapists, and undergraduate students. Memory, 25, 57–68.
Otgaar H., Candel I. (2010). Children’s false memories: Different false memory paradigms reveal different results. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 513–528.
Otgaar H., Candel I., Smeets T., Merckelbach H. (2010). “I didn’t take Lucy’s skirt off”: The effect of misleading information on omissions and commissions in children’s memory reports. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 229–241.
Otgaar H., de Ruiter C., Howe M. L., Hoetmer L., Van Reekum P. (2022). A case concerning children’s false memories of abuse: Recommendations regarding expert witness work. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24, 365–378. [Google Scholar]
Otgaar H., Howe M. L., Brackmann N., Smeets T. (2022). The malleability of developmental trends in neutral and negative memory illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 31–55.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]
Otgaar H., Howe M. L., Muris P. (in press). Maltreatment increases spontaneous false memories but decreases suggestion-induced false memories in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]
Otgaar H., Howe M. L., Peters M., Smeets T., Moritz S. (2014). The production of spontaneous false memories across childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 121, 28–41. [PubMed]
Otgaar H., Howe M. L., van Beers J., van Hoof R., Bronzwaer N., Smeets T. (2015). The positive ramifications of false memories using a perceptual closure task. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 43–50.
Otgaar H., Merckelbach H., Jelicic M., Smeets T. (2022). The potential for false memories is bigger than what Brewin and Andrews suggest. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 24–25. [PMC free article]
Otgaar H., Peters M., Howe M. L. (2012). Dividing attention lowers children’s but increases adults’ false memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 204–210. [PubMed]
Otgaar H., Scoboria A., Smeets T. (2013). Experimentally evoking nonbelieved memories for childhood events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 717–730.
Patihis L., Ho L. Y., Tingen I. W., Lilienfeld S. O., Loftus E. F. (2014). Are the “memory wars” over? A scientist-practitioner gap in beliefs about repressed memory. Psychological Science, 25, 519–530. [PubMed]
Pessoa L. (2022). A network model of the emotional brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 357–371. [PMC free article]
Peters M. J. V., Jelicic M., Gorski B.,
Sijstermans K., Giesbrecht T., Merckelbach H. (2008). The corrective effects of warning on false memories in the DRM paradigm are limited to full attention conditions. Acta Psychologica, 129, 308–314. [PubMed]
Peters M. J. V., Jelicic M., Verbeek H., Merckelbach H. (2007). Poor working memory predicts false memories. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 213–232.
Peters M. J. V., Moritz S., Tekin S., Jelicic M., Merckelbach H. (2012). Susceptibility to misleading information under social pressure in schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53, 1187–1193. [PubMed]
Pezdek K., Lam S. (2007). What research paradigms have cognitive psychologists used to study “false memory,” and what are the implications of these choices? Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 2–17.
Posner M. L, Snyder C. R. R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In Rabbitt P. M. A., Dornic S. (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 669–682). Tp New York, NY: Academic Press.
Reder L. M., Park H., Kieffaber P. D. (2009). Memory systems do not divide on consciousness:
Reinterpreting memory in terms of activation and binding. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 23–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Reyna V. F., Corbin J. C., Weldon R. B., Brainerd C. J. (2022). How fuzzy-trace theory predicts true and false memories for words, sentences, and narratives. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5, 1–9.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]
Roediger H. L., III, Balota D. A., Watson J. M. (2001). Spreading activation and the arousal of false memories. In Roediger III H. L., Nairne J. S., Neath I., Surprenant A. M. (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G.
Crowder (pp. 95–115). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. [Google
Roediger H. L., McDermott K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814.
Roediger H. L., Watson J. M., McDermott K. B., Gallo D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 385–407. [PubMed]
Rose E. J., Ebmeier K. P. (2006). Pattern of impaired working memory during major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 90, 149–161.
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Rubin D. C., Berntsen D., Bohni M. K. (2008). A memory-based model of posttraumatic stress disorder: Evaluating basic assumptions underlying the PTSD diagnosis. Psychological Review, 115, 985–1011.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]
Rubin D. C., Talarico J. M. (2009). A comparison of dimensional models of emotion: Evidence from emotions, prototypical events, autobiographical memories, and words. Memory, 17, 802–808.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]
Schweizer S., Dalgleish T. (2011). Emotional working memory capacity in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 498–504.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]
Scoboria A., Wade K. A., Lindsay D. S., Azad T., Strange D., Ost J., Hyman I. E. (2022). A mega-analysis of memory reports from eight peer-reviewed false memory implantation studies. Memory, 25, 146–163. [PubMed]
Shapiro F. (1995). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures. Tp New York, NY: Guilford.
Simonsohn U., Nelson L. D., Simmons J. P. (2014).
P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 534–547. [PubMed]
Steyvers M., Tenenbaum J. B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41–78. [PubMed]
Sumner J. A. (2012). The mechanisms underlying overgeneral autobiographical memory: An evaluative review of evidence for the CaR-FA-X model. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 34–48. [PMC free article]
Thijssen J., Otgaar H., Howe M. L., de Ruiter C. (2013). Emotional true and false memories in children with callous-unemotional traits. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 761–768. [PubMed]
Toffalini E., Mirandola C., Drabik M., Melinder A., Cornoldi C. (2014). Emotional negative events do not protect against false memories in young adults with depressive-anxious personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences,
Triantafyllou D., North C. S., Zartman A., Roediger H. L. (2015). A Deese-Roediger-McDermott study of trauma memory among employees of Tp New York City companies affected by the September 11, 2001, attacks. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 27, 165–174.
Valentino K., Cicchetti D., Rogosch F., Toth S. L. (2008). True and false recall and dissociation among maltreated children: The role of self-schema. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 213–232.
Van den Hout M. A., Engelhard I. M. (2012). How does EMDR work? Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 3, 724–738.
Voss J. F., Vesonder G. T., Spilich G.
J. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 651–667.
Wade K. A., Sharman S. J., Garry M., Memon A., Mazzoni G., Merckelbach H., Loftus E. F. (2007). False claims about false memory research. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 18–28. [PubMed]
Wang J., Otgaar H., Howe M. L., Smeets T., Merckelbach H., Nahouli Z. (2022). Undermining belief in false memories leads to less efficient problem-solving. Memory, 25, 910–921. [PubMed]
Wenzlaff R. M., Wegner D. M., Roper D. (1988). Depression and mental control: The resurgence of unwanted negative thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 882–892. [PubMed]
Werner-Seidler A., Moulds M. L. (2012). Characteristics of self-defining memory in depression vulnerability. Memory, 20, 935–948.
M. G., Barnhofer T., Crane C., Hermans D., Raes F., Watkins E., Dalgleish T. (2007). Autobiographical memory specificity and emotional disorder. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 122–138. [PMC free article]
Yeh Z., Hua M. (2009). Effects of depressive disorder on false memory for emotional information. Depression and Anxiety, 26, 456–463.
W., Gross J., Hayne H. (in press). If you’re happy and you know it: Positive moods reduce age-related differences in false memory. Child Development. [PubMed]
Zhu B., Chen C., Loftus
E. F., Lin C., Dong Q.. (2013). The relationship between DRM and misinformation false memories. Memory & Cognition, 41, 832–838. [PubMed]
Zoellner L. A., Foa E. B., Brigidi B., Przeworski A. (2000). Are trauma victims susceptible to “false memories”? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 517–524. [PubMed]
Who was John Watson AP Psychology?
John Watson was a behaviorist psychologist who studied observable behaviors and led the Little Albert experiment, where he trained an 11-month-old boy to fear a white rat 🐁 The boy was not initially afraid of the rat, but when the white rat was paired with a loud sound the boy would show signs of distress.
Which psychologists is best associated with studying the function of memory?
Which of the following psychologists is best associated with studying the function of memory? Hermann Ebbinghaus studied memory by memorizing nonsense syllables and seeing how many he could remember.
Who is Elizabeth Loftus quizlet?
Who is she? Loftus is best known for her ground-breaking work on the misinformation effect and eyewitness memory, and the creation and nature of false memories, including recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.
What are false memories quizlet?
False Memory. Memories that people have that do not correspond to events as they actually happened. Correspondence. The match between the retrieved memory and the actual sự kiện from the past.
Tải thêm tài liệu liên quan đến nội dung bài viết Which of the following psychologists is most strongly associated with research on false memories?
Video Which of the following psychologists is most strongly associated with research on false memories? ?
Bạn vừa tìm hiểu thêm tài liệu Với Một số hướng dẫn một cách rõ ràng hơn về Clip Which of the following psychologists is most strongly associated with research on false memories? tiên tiến và phát triển nhất
Chia Sẻ Link Download Which of the following psychologists is most strongly associated with research on false memories? miễn phí
Người Hùng đang tìm một số trong những Chia SẻLink Download Which of the following psychologists is most strongly associated with research on false memories? miễn phí.
Giải đáp vướng mắc về Which of the following psychologists is most strongly associated with research on false memories?
Nếu sau khi đọc nội dung bài viết Which of the following psychologists is most strongly associated with research on false memories? vẫn chưa hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại phản hồi ở cuối bài để Admin lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha
#psychologists #strongly #research #false #memories