Mẹo Hướng dẫn Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? Mới nhất 2022

You đang tìm kiếm từ khóa Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? Mới nhất được Update vào lúc : 2022-10-19 17:10:00 . Với phương châm chia sẻ Bí kíp Hướng dẫn trong nội dung bài viết một cách Chi Tiết 2022. Nếu sau khi đọc nội dung bài viết vẫn ko hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại phản hồi ở cuối bài để Admin lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha.

Kinh Nghiệm về Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? Mới Nhất
Quý khách đang tìm kiếm từ khóa Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? được Cập Nhật vào lúc : 2022-10-19 17:05:23 . Với phương châm chia sẻ Thủ Thuật Hướng dẫn trong nội dung nội dung bài viết một cách Chi Tiết 2022. Nếu sau khi tìm hiểu thêm tài liệu vẫn ko hiểu thì hoàn toàn hoàn toàn có thể lại Comments ở cuối bài để Mình lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha.

Summary

Nội dung chính

    Read a brief summary of this topic Characteristics and paradoxes of bureaucracyJurisdictional competencyCommand and controlProfessionalizationWhat are the characteristics of Weber’s ideal type of bureaucracy?What are the 5 characteristics of the official Weber?Which of the following is an ideal characteristic of bureaucracies?What are the 5 characteristics of bureaucracy?

Read a brief summary of this topic

bureaucracy, specific form of organization defined by complexity, division of labour, permanence, professional management, hierarchical coordination and control, strict chain of command, and legal authority. It is distinguished from informal and
collegial organizations. In its ideal form, bureaucracy is impersonal and rational and based on rules rather than ties of kinship, friendship, or patrimonial or
charismatic authority. Bureaucratic organization can be found in both public and private institutions.

Characteristics and paradoxes of bureaucracy

The
foremost theorist of bureaucracy is the German sociologist Max Weber (1864–1920), who described the ideal characteristics of bureaucracies and offered an explanation for the historical emergence of bureaucratic institutions. According to Weber, the
defining features of bureaucracy sharply distinguish it from other types of organization based on nonlegal forms of authority. Weber observed that the advantage of bureaucracy was that it was the most technically proficient form of organization, possessing specialized expertise, certainty, continuity, and unity. Bureaucracy’s emergence as a preferred form of organization
occurred with the rise of a money-based economy (which ultimately resulted in the development of capitalism) and the attendant need to ensure impersonal, rational-legal transactions. Instrumental organizations (e.g., public-stock business firms) soon arose because their bureaucratic organization equipped them to handle the various demands of capitalist
production more efficiently than small-scale producers.

Contemporary stereotypes of bureaucracy tend to portray it as unresponsive, lethargic, undemocratic, and incompetent. Weber’s theory of bureaucracy,
however, emphasizes not only its comparative technical and proficiency advantages but also attributes its dominance as a form of organization to the diminution of caste systems (such as feudalism) and other forms of inequitable social relations based upon a person’s status. In the pure form of bureaucratic organization universalized
rules and procedures would dominate, rendering personal status or connections irrelevant. In this form, bureaucracy is the epitome of universalized standards under which similar cases are treated similarly as codified by law and rules, and under which the individual tastes and discretion of the administrator are constrained by
due process rules. Despite the widespread derogatory stereotypes of bureaucracy, a system of government grounded in law requires bureaucracy to function.

Nevertheless, the words bureaucracy and bureaucrat are typically thought of and used pejoratively. They convey images of red tape, excessive rules and regulations, unimaginativeness, a lack of individual discretion, central control, and an absence of accountability. Far from being conceived as proficient, popular contemporary portrayals often paint bureaucracies as inefficient and lacking in adaptability. Because the characteristics that define the organizational advantages
of bureaucracy also contain within them the possibilities of organizational dysfunction, both the flattering and unflattering depictions of bureaucracy can be accurate. Thus, the characteristics that make bureaucracies proficient paradoxically also may produce organizational pathologies.

Jurisdictional competency

Jurisdictional
competency is a key element of bureaucratic organization, which is broken into units with defined responsibilities. Fundamentally, jurisdictional competency refers to bureaucratic specialization, with all elements of a bureaucracy possessing a defined role. The responsibilities of individuals broaden with movement upward through an organizational
hierarchy. The organizational division of labour enables units and individuals within an organization to master details and skills and to turn the novel into the routine. Although the division of labour is highly efficient, it can lead to a number of harmful
organizational pathologies; for example, units or individuals may be unable to identify and respond adequately to problems outside their competency and may approach all problems and priorities exclusively from the purview of a unit’s specific capabilities. This feature of bureaucracy also can lead organizational units to shirk responsibility by allowing them to define a problem as
belonging to some other unit and thereby leave the issue unattended. Alternatively, every unit within an organization is apt to put a face on a problem congenial mainly to its own interests, skills, and technologies.

Command and control

Bureaucracies have clear lines of command
and control. Bureaucratic authority is organized hierarchically, with responsibility taken the top and delegated with decreasing discretion below. Because of the risk of organizational parochialism produced by limited and specific jurisdictional competencies, the
capacity to coordinate and control the multiplicity of units is essential. Authority is the glue that holds together diversity and prevents units from exercising unchecked discretion. Yet, few features of bureaucratic life have received so much adverse attention as the role of hierarchical authority as a means for achieving organizational command and control. Popular
criticisms emphasize that hierarchical organization strangles creative impulses and injects hyper-cautious modes of behaviour based on expectations of what superiors may desire. Command and control, which are necessary to coordinate the disparate elements of
bureaucratic organization, provide for increasing responsibility upward, delegation, and decreasing discretion downward.

Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content. Subscribe Now

Continuity

Continuity is another key element of bureaucratic organization. Rational-legal authority necessitates uniform rules and procedures for written documents and official behaviour. A bureaucracy’s files (i.e., its past records) provide it with organizational memory, thereby enabling it to follow precedent and standard operating procedures. The ability to utilize standard operating procedures makes
organizations more efficient by decreasing the costs attached to any given transaction. Organizational files record procedures, antecedent behaviour, and personnel records. They also allow an organization to be continuous and, thus, independent of any specific leadership. On the whole, continuity is vital to an organization’s capacity to retain its identity and even its
culture. Without its records, it would be impossible to maintain transactions grounded in legality. Yet continuity also has a dysfunctional side, leading organizations to behave predictably and conservatively or, worse perhaps, merely reflexively. Continuity also may lead a bureaucracy to repeat regularly activities that may be inaccurate and whose inaccuracies thereby cumulate.

Professionalization

Professionalization of management, another basic element of bureaucracy, requires a full-time corps of officials whose attention is devoted exclusively to its managerial responsibilities. In government, professionalization is vested in the corps of
civil servants whose positions have generally been obtained through the passage of tests based upon merit. The civil service is sometimes considered a permanent government, distinct from the
transient politicians who serve only for a limited time and the pleasure of the electorate in democratic political systems.

In businesses and in other nongovernmental bureaucratic
organizations, there is also a professional cadre of managers. Professionalization increases expertise and continuity within the organization. Even when organizations are temporarily leaderless or experience turmoil in their top leadership positions, the professional cadre helps to maintain an organizational equilibrium. The virtues of professionalization are clear: without
a professional corps, organizations would suffer from crises induced by incompetency. Professionalization thus contributes to the superior technical proficiency that Weber claimed was the hallmark of bureaucratic organization.

Despite its virtues, professionalization also carries potential risks. Often the professional corps of managerial experts itself becomes a covert source of power because it has superior knowledge compared with those who are its
nominal but temporary superiors. By virtue of greater experience, mastery of detail, and organizational and substantive knowledge, professional
bureaucrats may exercise strong influence over decisions made by their leaders. The existence of powerful bureaucrats raises issues of accountability and responsibility, particularly in democratic systems; bureaucrats are supposedly the agents of their leaders, but their superior knowledge of detail can place them in a position of indispensability. In addition, although a
permanent corps of officials brings expertise and mastery of detail to decision making, it also deepens the innate conservatism of a bureaucracy. The permanent corps is usually skeptical of novelty because the essence of bureaucratic organization is to turn past novelties into present routines.
Professional bureaucrats, be they in the civil or private sector, also tend to favour the organizational status quo because their investments (e.g., training and status) are tied to it. Consequently, the more professionalized the cadre becomes, the more likely it is to resist the intrusion of external forces.

Rules

Rules are the lifeblood of bureaucratic organization, providing a rational and
continuous basis for procedures and operations. An organization’s files provide the inventory of accumulated rules. Bureaucratic decisions and—above all—procedures are grounded in codified rules and precedents. Although most people dislike rules that inhibit them, the existence of rules is characteristic of legal-rational authority, ensuring that decisions are not arbitrary, that
standardized procedures are not readily circumvented, and that order is maintained. Rules are the essence of bureaucracy but are also the bane of leaders who want to get things done their way instantly.

Rules restrain
arbitrary behaviour, but they also can provide formidable roadblocks to achievement. The accumulation of rules sometimes leads to the development of inconsistencies, and the procedures required to change any element of the status quo may become extraordinarily onerous as a result of the rule-driven character of bureaucracy. One perspective holds that the strict
adherence to rules restricts the ability of a bureaucracy to adapt to new circumstances. By contrast, markets, which can operate with very few rules, force rapid adaptation to changing
circumstances. Yet, most major business organizations are arranged in bureaucratic form because hierarchy and delegated responsibility reduce the transaction costs of making decisions.

Summary

Thus, the most basic elements of pure bureaucratic organization are its emphasis on procedural regularity, a hierarchical
system of accountability and responsibility, specialization of function, continuity, a legal-rational basis, and fundamental conservatism. The emergence of capitalism and the emphasis on standard currency transactions over and above barter systems created the need for bureaucratic forms of organization in both the private and public sectors. However,
the critical elements of the bureaucratic form of organization also can conflict with one another and are often the base of criticisms that regard bureaucracies as dysfunctional. In sum, what makes bureaucracy work also may work against it.

What are the characteristics of Weber’s ideal type of bureaucracy?

The essential characteristics of Weber’s bureaucracy are: hierarchy of authority, salaried careers, specialization and technical qualification, and written rules.

What are the 5 characteristics of the official Weber?

Weber’s bureaucratic principles states that an organization should have written rules, hierarchy of authority, system of task relationships and fair evaluation and reward.

Which of the following is an ideal characteristic of bureaucracies?

In its ideal form, bureaucracy is impersonal and rational and based on rules rather than ties of kinship, friendship, or patrimonial or charismatic authority.

What are the 5 characteristics of bureaucracy?

Six Characteristics of Bureaucracy. A Formal Hierarchical Authority. … . Management By Rules. … . Division of Labor. … . Achievement-Based Advancement. … . Efficient Operations. … . Impersonal Environment..
Tải thêm tài liệu liên quan đến nội dung nội dung bài viết Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber?

Webers ideal bureaucracy
Bureaucratic management

Reply
8
0
Chia sẻ

Share Link Cập nhật Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? miễn phí

Bạn vừa Read Post Với Một số hướng dẫn một cách rõ ràng hơn về Video Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? tiên tiến và phát triển và tăng trưởng nhất Share Link Down Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? miễn phí.

Thảo Luận vướng mắc về Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber?
Nếu sau khi đọc nội dung nội dung bài viết Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? vẫn chưa hiểu thì hoàn toàn hoàn toàn có thể lại Comment ở cuối bài để Admin lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha
#characteristic #ideal #bureaucracy #put #Weber

4201

Review Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? Mới nhất ?

Bạn vừa Read tài liệu Với Một số hướng dẫn một cách rõ ràng hơn về Review Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? Mới nhất tiên tiến và phát triển nhất

Share Link Cập nhật Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? Mới nhất miễn phí

Hero đang tìm một số trong những ShareLink Download Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? Mới nhất miễn phí.

Hỏi đáp vướng mắc về Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? Mới nhất

Nếu sau khi đọc nội dung bài viết Which of the following is a characteristic of the ideal bureaucracy as put forth by Weber? Mới nhất vẫn chưa hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại Comment ở cuối bài để Ad lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha
#characteristic #ideal #bureaucracy #put #Weber #Mới #nhất