Kinh Nghiệm Hướng dẫn Difference between article review and literature review Đầy đủ Chi Tiết

Bạn đang tìm kiếm từ khóa Difference between article review and literature review Đầy đủ được Cập Nhật vào lúc : 2022-12-06 08:04:00 . Với phương châm chia sẻ Thủ Thuật Hướng dẫn trong nội dung bài viết một cách Chi Tiết 2022. Nếu sau khi đọc Post vẫn ko hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại Comments ở cuối bài để Mình lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha.

Thủ Thuật Hướng dẫn Difference between article review and literature review Chi Tiết

Pro đang tìm kiếm từ khóa Difference between article review and literature review được Update vào lúc : 2022-12-06 08:04:11 . Với phương châm chia sẻ Thủ Thuật về trong nội dung nội dung bài viết một cách Chi Tiết Mới Nhất. Nếu sau khi Read nội dung nội dung bài viết vẫn ko hiểu thì hoàn toàn hoàn toàn có thể lại Comments ở cuối bài để Admin lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha.

The difference between a systematic review and a literature review

trang chủ | Blog | Best Practice | The difference between a systematic review and a literature review

Nội dung chính

    The difference between a systematic review and a literature review
    Covidence takes a look the difference between the two
    ‍️ What is a systematic review?
    When is it appropriate to do a systematic review?
    Key attributes
    ‍️ What is a literature review?
    When is it appropriate to do a literature review?
    Key attributes
    Ok, but what is a systematic literature review?
    Perhaps you’d also like…
    PICO: all you need to know
    The Librarians Role in a Systematic Review Team
    Mental Health in Academia
    Better systematic review management

    Covidence takes a look the difference between the two

    Most of us are familiar with the terms systematic review and literature review. Both review types synthesise evidence and provide summary information. So what are the differences? What does systematic mean? And which approach is best ?

    Systematic describes the reviews methods. It means that they are transparent, reproducible and defined before the search gets underway. Thats important because it helps to minimise the bias that would result from cherry-picking studies in a non-systematic way.

    This brings us to literature reviews. Literature reviews dont usually apply the same rigour in their methods. Thats because, unlike systematic reviews, they dont aim to produce an answer to a clinical question. Literature reviews can provide context or background information for a new piece of research. They can also stand alone as a general guide to what is already known about a particular topic.

    Interest in systematic reviews has grown in recent years and the frequency of systematic reviews in Google books has overtaken literature reviews (with all the usual Ngram Viewer warnings it searches around 6% of all books, no journals).

    Lets take a look the two review types in more detail to highlight some key similarities and differences .

    ‍️ What is a systematic review?

    Systematic reviews ask a specific question about the effectiveness of a treatment and answer it by summarising evidence that meets a set of pre-specified criteria.

    The process starts with a research question and a protocol or research plan. A review team searches for studies to answer the question using a highly sensitive search strategy. The retrieved studies are then screened for eligibility using the inclusion and exclusion criteria (this is done by least two people working independently). Next, the reviewers extract the relevant data and assess the quality of the included studies. Finally, the review team synthesises the extracted study data and presents the results. The process is shown in figure 2.

    The results of a systematic review can be presented in many ways and the choice will depend on factors such as the type of data. Some reviews use meta-analysis to produce a statistical summary of effect estimates. Other reviews use narrative synthesis to present a textual summary.

    Covidence accelerates the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment stages of your systematic review. It provides simple workflows and easy collaboration with colleagues around the world.

    When is it appropriate to do a systematic review?

    If you have a clinical question about the effectiveness of a particular treatment or treatments, you could answer it by conducting a systematic review. Systematic reviews in clinical medicine often follow the PICO framework, which stands for:

    Population (or patients)

    Intervention

    Comparison

    Outcome

    Heres a typical example of a systematic review title that uses the PICO framework:Alarms [intervention] versus drug treatments [comparison] for the prevention of nocturnal enuresis [outcome] in children [population]

    Key attributes

      Systematic reviews follow prespecified methods
      The methods are explicit and replicable
      The review team assesses the quality of the evidence and attempts to minimise bias
      Results and conclusions are based on the evidence

    ‍️ What is a literature review?

    Literature reviews provide an overview of what is known about a particular topic. They evaluate the material, rather than simply restating it, but the methods used to do this are not usually prespecified and they are not described in detail in the review. The search might be comprehensive but it does not aim to be exhaustive. Literature reviews are also referred to as narrative reviews.

    Literature reviews use a topical approach and often take the form of a discussion. Precision and replicability are not the focus, rather the author seeks to demonstrate their understanding and perhaps also present their work in the context of what has come before. Often, this sort of synthesis does not attempt to control for the authors own bias. The results or conclusion of a literature review is likely to be presented using words rather than statistical methods.

    When is it appropriate to do a literature review?

    Weve all written some form of literature review: they are a central part of academic research . Literature reviews often form the introduction to a piece of writing, to provide the context. They can also be used to identify gaps in the literature and the need to fill them with new research .

    Key attributes

      Literature reviews take a thematic approach
      They do not specify inclusion or exclusion criteria
      They do not answer a clinical question
      The conclusions might be influenced by the authors own views

    Ok, but what is a systematic literature review?

    A quick internet search retrieves a cool 200 million hits for systematic literature review. What strange hybrid is this ?

    Systematic review methodology has its roots in evidence-based medicine but it quickly gained traction in other areas the social sciences for example where researchers recognise the value of being methodical and minimising bias. Systematic review methods are increasingly applied to the more traditional types of review, including literature reviews, hence the proliferation of terms like systematic literature review and many more.

    Beware of the labels . The terminology used to describe review types can vary by discipline and changes over time. To really understand how any review was done you will need to examine the methods critically and make your own assessment of the quality and reliability of each synthesis .

    Conclusion

    Review methods are evolving constantly as researchers find new ways to meet the challenge of synthesising the evidence. Systematic review methods have influenced many other review types, including the traditional literature review.

    Covidence is a web-based tool that saves you time the screening, selection, data extraction and quality assessment stages of your systematic review. It supports easy collaboration across teams and provides a clear overview of task status.

    Get a glimpse inside Covidence and how it worksStart A Trial TodayLaura Mellor. Portsmouth, UKI am a freelance editor and writer with 20 years’ experience in academic publishing. I am the Editorial Assistant for the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. My favourite thing to do on the weekend is get up early and go for a swim in the sea. : @lauratorial.

    Share…

    Share on facebookFacebookShare on twitterTwitterShare on linkedinLinkedInPrevPreviousHow to conduct a systematic review from beginning to endNextThe difference between a systematic review & scoping reviewNext

    Perhaps you’d also like…

    Best Practice

    PICO: all you need to know

    PICO is an essential tool for systematic reviewers who are studying the effects of interventions. Learn more about how to use it.

    Read More Best Practice

    The Librarians Role in a Systematic Review Team

    Find out why a librarian should be included as part of your systematic review team and how to go about working together.

    Read More Best Practice

    Mental Health in Academia

    Systematic reviews are not for the faint of heart. Find out from others how to stay mentally healthy while completing your review.

    Read More

    Better systematic review management

    View PricingContact sales

    Reply

    9

    0

    Chia sẻ

    Share Link Download Difference between article review and literature review miễn phí

    Bạn vừa tìm hiểu thêm nội dung nội dung bài viết Với Một số hướng dẫn một cách rõ ràng hơn về Clip Difference between article review and literature review tiên tiến và phát triển và tăng trưởng nhất Share Link Down Difference between article review and literature review miễn phí.

    Thảo Luận vướng mắc về Difference between article review and literature review

    Nếu sau khi đọc nội dung nội dung bài viết Difference between article review and literature review vẫn chưa hiểu thì hoàn toàn hoàn toàn có thể lại Comments ở cuối bài để Tác giả lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha

    #Difference #article #review #literature #review

4311

Review Difference between article review and literature review Đầy đủ ?

Bạn vừa đọc Post Với Một số hướng dẫn một cách rõ ràng hơn về Review Difference between article review and literature review Đầy đủ tiên tiến và phát triển nhất

Chia Sẻ Link Tải Difference between article review and literature review Đầy đủ miễn phí

Bạn đang tìm một số trong những ShareLink Download Difference between article review and literature review Đầy đủ Free.

Hỏi đáp vướng mắc về Difference between article review and literature review Đầy đủ

Nếu sau khi đọc nội dung bài viết Difference between article review and literature review Đầy đủ vẫn chưa hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại Comments ở cuối bài để Admin lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha
#Difference #article #review #literature #review #Đầy #đủ